[Bimi] Logo/Trademark conflict

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Wed, 10 April 2019 16:10 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2FF81200B1 for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:10:40 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.7
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.7 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id TR90WOHslty4 for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from simon.songbird.com (simon.songbird.com [72.52.113.5]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4EB841203B7 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:10:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.85] (108-226-162-63.lightspeed.sntcca.sbcglobal.net [108.226.162.63]) (authenticated bits=0) by simon.songbird.com (8.14.4/8.14.4/Debian-4.1ubuntu1.1) with ESMTP id x3AGCPeX019544 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NOT) for <bimi@ietf.org>; Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:12:25 -0700
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=simple/simple; d=dcrocker.net; s=default; t=1554912745; bh=3A4zeZk1HUKEU92/27J7KFCwzx9HxmX6vmVqImwI1ho=; h=To:Reply-To:From:Subject:Date:From; b=LyC5JKfXjOPcrS3EGSSGsJqY/z7V25JuKl2XL51e6/CxDPhdnkP/fwVzeKZT2ZLH4 0p9V8DZ+/Ok6SUTAyjECWz/mjg2dhz4KsMgngB9EN+Ovmusko1lmYVMgVsAuVWGquA v7bIxw/YFjw+BGFTgnph712GqxkTvQbOhq/YsxpA=
To: "bimi@ietf.org" <bimi@ietf.org>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
Message-ID: <54c335ec-d4a7-d842-1d72-af5a5ec8df43@dcrocker.net>
Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 09:10:31 -0700
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:60.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/60.6.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Language: en-US
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bimi/09pw0qrf72LA_0BeLyuKIwvKxso>
Subject: [Bimi] Logo/Trademark conflict
X-BeenThere: bimi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Brand Indicators for Message Identification <bimi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bimi/>
List-Post: <mailto:bimi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2019 16:10:41 -0000

Relative to the general topic of international trademarks, conflicts for 
domain names are pretty simple.

And yet this isn't that unusual or even unexpected:

      ICANN takes the reins again as .amazon talks fail

 
http://domainincite.com/24133-icann-takes-the-reins-again-as-amazon-talks-fail?fbclid=IwAR1klnGGJtlFSdbE_OvNLUCSgD_uuhKGttRaKcsRzF7pwC7nQaN1dn8SAjM


When the design of Bimi can deal with resolving this sort of problem, it 
will be reasonable to consider it more substantially.

d/
-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net