IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bimi] draft-bkl-bimi-overview-00

Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com> Sun, 17 March 2019 21:24 UTC

Return-Path: <seth@valimail.com>
X-Original-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 338E6127964 for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:24:01 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=valimail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id DpaXE7xTO9Zg for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-wm1-x32a.google.com (mail-wm1-x32a.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:4864:20::32a]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2A4DB1277D7 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-wm1-x32a.google.com with SMTP id o10so12992863wmc.1 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:23:59 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=valimail.com; s=google2048; h=mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=UY6aUSTUuzjPvRKXUyBQJS/gVmMdST+X1ogmsEtphZM=; b=Yu7xqk+A+kTbMzk9SDEICSO/+f76WFjYWTlKyuY72Dbj+53B/rLtsoWD4XCoJ72KXN cI7E48gU0JmDFouvTrQfebjCuNObU2A+rfbv3QSrqxVkKG8e2rjM1y/j8mBMR128yki4 pVdzIPSEqL9uLATddDCjibBZUov5C4bRkXHo9gwBKN6YMZvNLl8vLNLak7LEvAV4c2dI g2PBg5Dd7VsQ2JWwNy95QC9WEOMcYBpIP6pIhSMOzrBW4htI00LoyB3UOmp66lUYP2nP 81y0otxKewRFYtlKpwR/pWfprMdvEActeNevriVxdizSDC0wyegLFtKw/Ksn5tssRmGw OpsA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:references:in-reply-to:from:date :message-id:subject:to; bh=UY6aUSTUuzjPvRKXUyBQJS/gVmMdST+X1ogmsEtphZM=; b=n5mpEn0sLwc/tMraQykWqUwUkipxeY+16XYCLbi07bWlaPtcb6tYJR2lCyhYCpXxnc sMUVn/bziEooSYke/Jwpd0jKnUmj9J3LKhlbxBk5K6UBMvQ1Y92Csfr3YDZ2SFO5Ung4 PSaI02XuFKdK4iwt0eL93LaQhCEXvxE0qdQ/OynvDfyQKd0JjoNEUQP8BMjqN8U2eXw9 UYKHBADweYS8MntW0lxyo4AL1R8K2vaGgc6JQtTZImXBh7hYti6Ukoye7yhvU/5RR0VM xfdttgReLwmWUT2ZrbgTuOrW2ROtpnHVogrZwIJqXOv0ctLxfuH21KEXyHa5/ioYDD0/ GpKw==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAX3oZyR8g05tNghHFrIVnGhffQt12KH6NgXANaHylNFgBgV8DRH pQz807gr8PSgJ3CHZu7wyyEeac3y5O5V2arUAEV5Zp+xvLI=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqw5DRYJVNYe5PH1g2Xke0bT6tN3JOyNjd4Caz1SkxxpBIYsf5jen++IN4PcCYLxRmuKnnpeuNnIT9pcRMK6m4o=
X-Received: by 2002:a1c:e2c2:: with SMTP id z185mr8513960wmg.84.1552857837317; Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:23:57 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <CAOZAAfOKm=NO4w=GwgxMLcqYKkkHgh00NSd5spFBs-5tp=QH_w@mail.gmail.com> <20190317211417.3F62A200FF7F2A@ary.qy>
In-Reply-To: <20190317211417.3F62A200FF7F2A@ary.qy>
From: Seth Blank <seth@valimail.com>
Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 14:23:46 -0700
Message-ID: <CAOZAAfMc4j3HV3JXLxV3G0pip27wsmb0gfnhvFUUn9aCUiVgiA@mail.gmail.com>
To: bimi@ietf.org
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="000000000000c7cc78058450e3dc"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bimi/1x06Fi8TTrmtg9GVOS9tQhcw6Ps>
Subject: Re: [Bimi] draft-bkl-bimi-overview-00
X-BeenThere: bimi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Brand Indicators for Message Identification <bimi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bimi/>
List-Post: <mailto:bimi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 17 Mar 2019 21:24:01 -0000

On Sun, Mar 17, 2019 at 2:14 PM John Levine <johnl@taugh.com> wrote:

> In article <CAOZAAfOKm=NO4w=GwgxMLcqYKkkHgh00NSd5spFBs-5tp=
> QH_w@mail.gmail.com> you write:
> >> recipients. I think it should also identify that there are potential
> >> benefits to receivers and operators of MUAs too.
>
> I would want to see more than speculation there.


BIMI is about standardizing logo discovery, making a currently siloed
process approachable to domain owners and smaller receivers.

This is the value I believe Kurt was alluding to (for receivers and thick
mail clients) - nothing at all about the user impact, for the exact reasons
you outlined.

Seth

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email