IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [Bimi] Alternate proposal

Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net> Thu, 21 July 2022 21:02 UTC

Return-Path: <dhc@dcrocker.net>
X-Original-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bimi@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7FFD1C157B35 for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:02:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.108
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.108 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=dcrocker.net
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FkiqfuxRwEhe for <bimi@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:02:16 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dragonfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net (dragonfly.birch.relay.mailchannels.net [23.83.209.51]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 97D47C14CF01 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:02:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
Received: from relay.mailchannels.net (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C0808E1358 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:02:13 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io (unknown [127.0.0.6]) (Authenticated sender: hostingeremail) by relay.mailchannels.net (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 8C7568E14E5 for <bimi@ietf.org>; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:02:12 +0000 (UTC)
ARC-Seal: i=1; s=arc-2022; d=mailchannels.net; t=1658437332; a=rsa-sha256; cv=none; b=RGjY+tpcKYlxCP+/6uShBCMnW9KH3sBU/T6NSB9oG2n7rXRZFzAoYhXofSQXSCBS5k1z6q bBKUXuT5yzKK0QTpH/1l2TyQH+lYGS1amxMaOai1BWzVZbCYs1+kqmb0E/fxGao9aCitzn xsVlt1CWDyD/GW09xiuISESu1TaLvOuGuUOzWRrHBi6qaWAbWIghDIE96WsNpJUVtUfdW1 LN0BoHo20LqjWfABox2Azcsld27xh4PWvG31Ebj2rMUpUCP5iJHyZ/egLUT7tJJOwtSuiV eMALnQ/x+PWAUJezREo12PJWAubegiadFhVTMc1XbJQ5sPtuwn+EhxdgY1v6Gg==
ARC-Message-Signature: i=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=mailchannels.net; s=arc-2022; t=1658437332; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references:dkim-signature; bh=J2KP7vje0MVvpWHLIi2lk9+woWRGd7BwnlWs0LkU/lA=; b=wfvXWB2QAosdyCyAywcTzX1OJSKBN+A80JK1xJC80ena9BlT3W2AlWFLB3LoLNcr9HOqTx qUCoMvkPon5y3rnwSy/7TIZKAyo8KU19Mlajcw2MAO+TQ0PVfZRrcbKxkyozA/HYJ51mHu Vf1Aob4SKBGMzHYNBhH1WC8o6ojiBJM3JCmfEt1zeOnEetH/XTgwl62flk0s5vXD3GX+nK sIBd9SZ3Sx1Bo81GoUAc8ruAFSayjTua92zx7Gxt3iNdbvjVNvy6sbblH4Usf8EVgxGJ4t /i9fFDBvV3SOW41UGOxRfehLf06OnIXT0vCXyny7BdKkLWoFLwrIL8fq/OMNbw==
ARC-Authentication-Results: i=1; rspamd-689699966c-ls5jj; auth=pass smtp.auth=hostingeremail smtp.mailfrom=dhc@dcrocker.net
X-Sender-Id: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MC-Relay: Neutral
X-MailChannels-SenderId: hostingeremail|x-authsender|dhc@dcrocker.net
X-MailChannels-Auth-Id: hostingeremail
X-Exultant-Absorbed: 73d4556a36aef531_1658437332897_1141950378
X-MC-Loop-Signature: 1658437332896:1906411636
X-MC-Ingress-Time: 1658437332896
Received: from gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io (gcp-us-central1-a-smtpout2.hostinger.io [35.192.45.35]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256) by 100.127.95.92 (trex/6.7.1); Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:02:12 +0000
Received: from [192.168.0.104] (c-73-170-122-71.hsd1.ca.comcast.net [73.170.122.71]) (Authenticated sender: dhc@dcrocker.net) by smtp.hostinger.com (smtp.hostinger.com) with ESMTPSA id 4LplPZ1Xmfz7YpHq; Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:02:10 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=dcrocker.net; s=hostingermail-a; t=1658437331; h=from:from:reply-to:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date: message-id:message-id:to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version: content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=J2KP7vje0MVvpWHLIi2lk9+woWRGd7BwnlWs0LkU/lA=; b=I48VwYm+J2INaJa85apxH47s0CljBGWPYw28J9dEf09mbrjxG0/4zv8/oNOT/vB57Ahff7 q4VGWSRXifpE4Bj68n8EQMCDhY1ClpTtDT//oUc9Cc/4sPtInzLM9JBJOMsgdtmlD8h6sm 0S/ezM8XooP+nqeZuqtkTsPaQijNcNZszL2tBNQOzw5SQqbyjZdaG2glUJgdvezdNchcgP Z8OJq4096toSAj4NipakYVXSLuvAS5Yr6cT7iIzL0goOkjDd2RhSKHoKj5UyrAofbi+zUg twaGOTn3bwwR6P6eDOKtFB/4v0/CH4/gQX6s+QI8OQcnROM6wVkFrp8uUx/rBQ==
Message-ID: <c0f2d93f-3936-747d-5bc0-f2dfbf5c5bf1@dcrocker.net>
Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 14:02:08 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:91.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/91.11.0
Content-Language: en-US
To: Ken O'Driscoll <ken@wemonitoremail.com>
Cc: "bimi@ietf.org" <bimi@ietf.org>
References: <3E050BDC62D7946860C5E1E6@PSB> <CAHej_8nHgAVWNLDk11j4gY+KxY+e=gcAAzJHryWXELQoY+65Ww@mail.gmail.com> <E5ADBB85022B6D97DDC8AE7C@PSB> <083ADECC-EFC8-4AD1-9DA0-6AAF08342330@proofpoint.com> <VI1PR01MB7053ED7C0857415D1A0A0F71C7919@VI1PR01MB7053.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com> <9ecfc849-8ed5-6d4a-1165-b1b1297ec7d1@dcrocker.net> <VI1PR01MB70538885513AB4C0D65F20D2C7919@VI1PR01MB7053.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
From: Dave Crocker <dhc@dcrocker.net>
Reply-To: dcrocker@bbiw.net
Organization: Brandenburg InternetWorking
In-Reply-To: <VI1PR01MB70538885513AB4C0D65F20D2C7919@VI1PR01MB7053.eurprd01.prod.exchangelabs.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bimi/W2sOcTQaA6AxA5ggxPSHk1FjPmQ>
Subject: Re: [Bimi] Alternate proposal
X-BeenThere: bimi@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Brand Indicators for Message Identification <bimi.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bimi/>
List-Post: <mailto:bimi@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bimi>, <mailto:bimi-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 21 Jul 2022 21:02:22 -0000

On 7/21/2022 1:57 PM, Ken O'Driscoll wrote:
> The point I was attempting to make was that an open dialogue that 
> doesn't cite a DMARC dependency or the sunk cost fallacy of code 
> already written, may produce a better proposed standard.

ack. tnx.

there might be a small matter of the long-standing reference to Bimi as 
a way to get more senders to adopt dmarc.

To the extent that reliance on DMARC actually creates technical or 
operational problems, the issue gets quite foundational...

d/

-- 
Dave Crocker
Brandenburg InternetWorking
bbiw.net

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email