Re: [BLISS] Status of draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-10

Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com> Wed, 14 September 2011 01:36 UTC

Return-Path: <shida@ntt-at.com>
X-Original-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 57B8621F8B9A for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:36:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.265
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.265 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, IP_NOT_FRIENDLY=0.334, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ZO+qbWHVjzV9 for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from gator465.hostgator.com (gator465.hostgator.com [69.56.174.130]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B3F5821F8B8B for <bliss@ietf.org>; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 18:36:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [122.135.86.64] (port=50803 helo=[192.168.1.139]) by gator465.hostgator.com with esmtpsa (TLSv1:AES128-SHA:128) (Exim 4.69) (envelope-from <shida@ntt-at.com>) id 1R3eQo-0002zr-8H; Tue, 13 Sep 2011 20:38:30 -0500
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Apple Message framework v1244.3)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
From: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F587F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 10:38:28 +0900
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <CAA1B333-D37D-4189-910F-86109E488C39@ntt-at.com>
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F5874@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>, <302B00E6-FA2F-45E6-8DFF-1ED88324A534@ntt-at.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F587F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.1244.3)
X-AntiAbuse: This header was added to track abuse, please include it with any abuse report
X-AntiAbuse: Primary Hostname - gator465.hostgator.com
X-AntiAbuse: Original Domain - ietf.org
X-AntiAbuse: Originator/Caller UID/GID - [47 12] / [47 12]
X-AntiAbuse: Sender Address Domain - ntt-at.com
X-BWhitelist: no
X-Source:
X-Source-Args:
X-Source-Dir:
X-Source-Sender: fl1-122-135-86-64.tky.mesh.ad.jp ([192.168.1.139]) [122.135.86.64]:50803
X-Source-Auth: shida@agnada.com
X-Email-Count: 5
X-Source-Cap: c3NoaWRhO3NzaGlkYTtnYXRvcjQ2NS5ob3N0Z2F0b3IuY29t
Cc: "bliss@ietf.org" <bliss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BLISS] Status of draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-10
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 14 Sep 2011 01:36:26 -0000

[ As a chair ]

Authors updated the draft reflecting Dale's comments.

 Please see the changes to make sure there is no further issues. 

 If there isn't I will get the author to post their draft and write up the 
proto-writeup based on the version 11 referenced here. 

 If you believe we need to further discuss the draft please let your 
voice heard by posting your opinion within a week. 

 http://bliss-ietf.org/drafts/draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-11.txt
 http://bliss-ietf.org/drafts/diff_10_11.html

 Regards
  Shida

On Sep 2, 2011, at 3:53 AM, Worley, Dale R (Dale) wrote:

>> From: Shida Schubert [shida@ntt-at.com]
>> 
>> I did a thorough review of the draft before submitting
>> to the IESG and I sent the following comments along
>> with a draft with my suggested edits (all nits).
> 
> A lot of improvements!
> 
> But I think the last paragraph of section 6.2 has some minor edit
> mistakes which damage the grammar:
> 
>   If the caller's agent becomes unwilling ??? no longer wants to initiate
>   the CC call (e.g., because the calling user???caller has deactivated
>   CC), the caller's agent terminates the subscription in accordance
>   with [RFC3265] or suspends the subscription(s) as specified in
>   subclause 6.5.
> 
> And in section 6.6, this sentence is missing a phrase:
> 
>    Note that the caller's agent's policy about resumption may
>    be manually initiated and thus should not be automatically resumed.
> 
> Perhaps,
> 
>    Note that the caller's agent's policy about resumption may be
>>>> that it must be<<< manually initiated and thus should not be
>    automatically resumed.
> 
> Looks good!
> 
> Dale