Re: [BLISS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-16.txt

<Martin.Huelsemann@telekom.de> Fri, 07 September 2012 11:36 UTC

Return-Path: <Martin.Huelsemann@telekom.de>
X-Original-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3C29021E803C for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 04:36:42 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.249
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.249 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, HELO_EQ_DE=0.35, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id VfcAIZX8P4iQ for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 04:36:41 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tcmail33.telekom.de (tcmail33.telekom.de [194.25.30.7]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C0CB21E8034 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 04:36:40 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from he111296.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([10.125.90.14]) by tcmail31.telekom.de with ESMTP/TLS/AES128-SHA; 07 Sep 2012 13:36:33 +0200
Received: from HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com ([169.254.4.3]) by HE111296.EMEA1.CDS.T-INTERNAL.COM ([fe80::19ac:3fb4:a382:6df4%16]) with mapi; Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:36:32 +0200
From: <Martin.Huelsemann@telekom.de>
To: <bliss@ietf.org>
Date: Fri, 7 Sep 2012 13:36:31 +0200
Thread-Topic: [BLISS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-16.txt
Thread-Index: Ac2M67BE74aWsXXYSACmx9xFW+KbIAAAEWiA
Message-ID: <9762ACF04FA26B4388476841256BDE02011659ED60FE@HE111543.emea1.cds.t-internal.com>
References: <20120907112655.31762.48528.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20120907112655.31762.48528.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: de-DE
Content-Language: de-DE
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: de-DE
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [BLISS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-16.txt
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 07 Sep 2012 11:36:42 -0000

Hi,

a new revision of the CC draft was uploaded, in which the presence server component of the CC monitor was specified a littlebit more exactly. Please check if the functionality is considered appropriately now.


Best regards, Martin



> -----Urspr√ľngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: bliss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bliss-bounces@ietf.org]
> Im Auftrag von internet-drafts@ietf.org
> Gesendet: Freitag, 7. September 2012 13:27
> An: i-d-announce@ietf.org
> Cc: bliss@ietf.org
> Betreff: [BLISS] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-16.txt
>
>
> A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line
> Internet-Drafts directories.
>  This draft is a work item of the Basic Level of
> Interoperability for SIP Services Working Group of the IETF.
>
>       Title           : Call Completion for Session
> Initiation Protocol (SIP)
>       Author(s)       : Dale R. Worley
>                           Martin Huelsemann
>                           Roland Jesske
>                           Denis Alexeitsev
>       Filename        : draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-16.txt
>       Pages           : 36
>       Date            : 2012-09-07
>
> Abstract:
>    The call completion feature defined in this specification
> allows the
>    caller of a failed call to be notified when the callee becomes
>    available to receive a call.
>
>    For the realization of a basic solution without queuing, this
>    document references the usage of the dialog event package
> (RFC 4235)
>    that is described as 'automatic redial' in the SIP Service Examples
>    (RFC 5359).
>
>    For the realization of a more comprehensive solution with queuing ,
>    this document introduces an architecture for implementing these
>    features in the Session Initiation Protocol where "Call completion"
>    implementations associated with the caller's and callee's endpoints
>    cooperate to place the caller's request for call completion into a
>    queue at the callee's endpoint, and when a caller's
> request is ready
>    to be serviced, re-attempt of the original, failed call is made.
>
>    The architecture is designed to interoperate well with
> existing call-
>    completion solutions in other networks.
>
>
> The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion
>
> There's also a htmlized version available at:
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-16
>
> A diff from the previous version is available at:
> http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-16
>
>
> Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at:
> ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
>
> _______________________________________________
> BLISS mailing list
> BLISS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss
>