Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event model
Scott Lawrence <xmlscott@gmail.com> Fri, 09 July 2010 13:11 UTC
Return-Path: <xmlscott@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C646A3A6A4E for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 06:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qRVfx-y73Yce for <bliss@core3.amsl.com>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 06:11:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-gy0-f172.google.com (mail-gy0-f172.google.com [209.85.160.172]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C75533A6A6E for <bliss@ietf.org>; Fri, 9 Jul 2010 06:11:31 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by gyh3 with SMTP id 3so1253885gyh.31 for <bliss@ietf.org>; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:11:33 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=r6s63XCRuCbWaubOHCEfuosTb/cPlNOmT3kXknt9D08=; b=bFZbu/OzHYSJPchGXezMtyruVwUhk76enQHGZlBJFTzQsLJvF32FlKsiy8J5LYOgYH fn+CUmleegUvB9nCYZdpKJ78PgKemXMNQWTLRJqpuVtAUuwBJCTfOSbcLvcotOBoQfQq RUj2fWzVa+Np4A+LUpCc/67tLGqs+rgDdHSao=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=iolrqwsbr5GMYvsxAKNuSv5uHxupjc8v5yBtuWmkNPiQ6dhJ4wPKWuh2UbB63VE79I dJfCBVhby9ciTHjjydK/wo9vlLVIKn44Lflh0z/zYdzo7ozunLBZ3rsW5AIDUXJfBtk+ vPuNiwR1WTXZvJ+k6m62QP0H+hlvQ2cISA+Ew=
Received: by 10.229.221.142 with SMTP id ic14mr5925808qcb.104.1278681060563; Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:11:00 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ybr.local ([204.9.221.67]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id h20sm3917364qcm.21.2010.07.09.06.10.59 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 09 Jul 2010 06:10:59 -0700 (PDT)
Message-ID: <4C371FE2.3070506@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 09:10:58 -0400
From: Scott Lawrence <xmlscott@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.4) Gecko/20100608 Thunderbird/3.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bliss@ietf.org
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EE8B@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B21FE98EE8B@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event model
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 09 Jul 2010 13:11:32 -0000
On 2010-07-08 23:32, WORLEY, Dale R (Dale) wrote: > The problem we run into is that if we have two callers awaiting CC for > the same callee, under the current I-D, they will both subscribe to > the same monitor URI. This makes it impossible (in theory) for the > monitor to send an "active" notification to one of the callers without > sending an "active" notification to the other caller, which isn't what > we want to do Why not send the notification to all subscribers, but include in the notice an explicit indication of which is active? Rather than send 'active', send 'active sip:subscriber@domain' where 'sip:subscriber@domain' is the contact URI from the head of the queue?
- [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event mod… WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event… Scott Lawrence
- Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event… WORLEY, Dale R (Dale)
- Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event… R.Jesske
- Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event… Paul Kyzivat
- Re: [BLISS] Call-completion issue 1010: The event… Martin.Huelsemann