Re: [BLISS] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances-11

Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com> Sat, 30 June 2012 00:43 UTC

Return-Path: <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 94E2721F849A; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.203
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.203 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=1.396, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id hTu8so4Rqnni; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:43:05 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ob0-f172.google.com (mail-ob0-f172.google.com [209.85.214.172]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E510E21F844B; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by obbwc20 with SMTP id wc20so4968301obb.31 for <multiple recipients>; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:43:04 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20120113; h=references:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:message-id :content-transfer-encoding:cc:x-mailer:from:subject:date:to; bh=eF5yYxdrm0swAjP9jGXQF5kDnPRhZ5N4RqNg9kmEaAg=; b=lmI3kN/oGVrNVHkFcngn92r1j6nz79rYUHZ9LmTrY6z+izKqaavsbSu4mkkSS9p7Lh UFbT681uPb65ttObCQhOgHSOPHhBicGul30lCpfNhOcwO2sv1mFA7el3R6KSD5SBBQeh 82KbdsDeR/2Sf+IO6c62aNkRpmKS5j/0BX/DsrQxL1yqFjFztzw7SP+e974xFg1EDaEC 3M7AAlmzkCLX+Z/P0zDMfmaBE7D1X1dw1Bk1Wb11ii2J5K9BWv2rXwhUjr9yLb7vfIsS 9yqKFUzTnlqxfbdsm3NoH3OLstuFflkXYa3sdoAiXuAsuLzaabi84CtDU0eYnx2wpE20 Vesw==
Received: by 10.60.21.198 with SMTP id x6mr2034683oee.24.1341016898396; Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:41:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.4.153.20] (mobile-166-147-069-169.mycingular.net. [166.147.69.169]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n10sm4159930oeb.6.2012.06.29.17.41.36 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=OTHER); Fri, 29 Jun 2012 17:41:37 -0700 (PDT)
References: <8D3D17ACE214DC429325B2B98F3AE71208D3A7FD@MX15A.corp.emc.com> <CAKhHsXEzQ9hrsRpkUsAMa2xaNwt8E7QM4ZVadTmqyX7hg0XJ1Q@mail.gmail.com> <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A1D0C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
In-Reply-To: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B22726A1D0C@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Message-Id: <8CC36564-7A02-47AC-9BCA-4DE0C9BECADE@gmail.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (9B206)
From: Alan Johnston <alan.b.johnston@gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 29 Jun 2012 19:41:28 -0500
To: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
Cc: "mohsen.soroush@sylantro.com" <mohsen.soroush@sylantro.com>, "ietf@ietf.org" <ietf@ietf.org>, "gen-art@ietf.org" <gen-art@ietf.org>, "bliss@ietf.org" <bliss@ietf.org>, "david.black@emc.com" <david.black@emc.com>
Subject: Re: [BLISS] Gen-ART review of draft-ietf-bliss-shared-appearances-11
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 30 Jun 2012 00:43:05 -0000

We will use this language. Thanks, Dale. 

 - Alan -



On Jun 29, 2012, at 2:18 PM, "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>; wrote:

> On Thu, 2012-06-28 at 20:05 -0500, Alan Johnston wrote:
>>> 
>>> 4.1 - REQ-16:
>>> 
>>>  in this case, seizing the line is the same thing as dialing.
>>> 
>>> That seems wrong - I would have thought it was a "prerequisite" as
>>> opposed to "the same thing" because seizing the line is immediately
>>> followed by a dialing request.
>> 
>> 
>> This requirement is about sending one request that causes both actions
>> to occur.  In a PSTN ringdown circuit (a very specialized circuit,
>> used for "hotlines"), the two operations are the same thing.  Besides
>> this statement, is REQ-16 itself not clear?  Perhaps I should just
>> remove this statement if it adds confusion rather than clarity to the
>> requirement.
> 
> IMHO, a good fix is:
> 
>   REQ-16 The mechanism should support a way for a UA to seize a
>   particular appearance number and also send the request at the same
>   time.  This is needed when an automatic ringdown feature (a telephone
>   configured to immediately dial a phone number when it goes off hook)
>   is combined with shared appearances - in this case, seizing the line
>   is >>>integrated with<<< dialing.
> 
> Dale
>