Re: [BLISS] Status of draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-10

"Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com> Thu, 01 September 2011 18:52 UTC

Return-Path: <dworley@avaya.com>
X-Original-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bliss@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D73C921F97C7 for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -103.462
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-103.462 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.137, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-1, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id aw-MIDMpW04p for <bliss@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:52:53 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com (de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com [198.152.71.100]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 208B321F97BC for <bliss@ietf.org>; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 11:52:52 -0700 (PDT)
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: Av8EAJPUX06HCzI1/2dsb2JhbABCqE93gUABAQEBAgESKD8FCwIBCA0IEBEQMiUBAQQOBQgah1CdNQKMbI9ehXtgBJhRi3o
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.68,314,1312171200"; d="scan'208";a="265636949"
Received: from unknown (HELO p-us1-erheast.us1.avaya.com) ([135.11.50.53]) by de307622-de-outbound.net.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2011 14:54:25 -0400
Received: from dc-us1hcex1.us1.avaya.com (HELO DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com) ([135.11.52.20]) by p-us1-erheast-out.us1.avaya.com with ESMTP; 01 Sep 2011 14:45:38 -0400
Received: from DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com ([169.254.2.172]) by DC-US1HCEX1.global.avaya.com ([2002:870b:3414::870b:3414]) with mapi; Thu, 1 Sep 2011 14:54:24 -0400
From: "Worley, Dale R (Dale)" <dworley@avaya.com>
To: Shida Schubert <shida@ntt-at.com>
Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 14:53:15 -0400
Thread-Topic: [BLISS] Status of draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-10
Thread-Index: AcxodHp9EE1lsEBnTKqoYiEvcygTXQAY+2Pw
Message-ID: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F587F@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>
References: <CD5674C3CD99574EBA7432465FC13C1B222B1F5874@DC-US1MBEX4.global.avaya.com>, <302B00E6-FA2F-45E6-8DFF-1ED88324A534@ntt-at.com>
In-Reply-To: <302B00E6-FA2F-45E6-8DFF-1ED88324A534@ntt-at.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: "bliss@ietf.org" <bliss@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [BLISS] Status of draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-10
X-BeenThere: bliss@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Basic Level of Interoperability for SIP Services \(BLISS\) BoF" <bliss.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bliss>
List-Post: <mailto:bliss@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss>, <mailto:bliss-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 01 Sep 2011 18:52:54 -0000

> From: Shida Schubert [shida@ntt-at.com]
> 
> I did a thorough review of the draft before submitting
> to the IESG and I sent the following comments along
> with a draft with my suggested edits (all nits).

A lot of improvements!

But I think the last paragraph of section 6.2 has some minor edit
mistakes which damage the grammar:

   If the caller's agent becomes unwilling ??? no longer wants to initiate
   the CC call (e.g., because the calling user???caller has deactivated
   CC), the caller's agent terminates the subscription in accordance
   with [RFC3265] or suspends the subscription(s) as specified in
   subclause 6.5.

And in section 6.6, this sentence is missing a phrase:

    Note that the caller's agent's policy about resumption may
    be manually initiated and thus should not be automatically resumed.

Perhaps,

    Note that the caller's agent's policy about resumption may be
    >>>that it must be<<< manually initiated and thus should not be
    automatically resumed.

Looks good!

Dale