Re: [BLISS] more comments on the CC draft

Keith;

 Below is the 09 version of the draft that was used to 
create the diff.

 http://bliss-ietf.org/drafts/draft-ietf-bliss-call-completion-09.txt

 Regards
  Shida

On Mar 31, 2011, at 6:32 PM, DRAGE, Keith (Keith) wrote:

> Can you provide access to the -09 version somewhere (and please not as the real -09 version as the changes are proposed for WG approval, and should not yet form part of the official WG draft).
>  
> I find the diff link provided less than useful in this form, and there are other things that need to be checked.
>  
> Keith
>  
> From: bliss-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bliss-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Martin.Huelsemann@telekom.de
> Sent: 31 March 2011 16:05
> To: bliss@ietf.org
> Cc: j.dave.smith@siemens-enterprise.com; R.Jesske@telekom.de
> Subject: [BLISS] more comments on the CC draft
>  
> Dear colleagues,
>  
> during the last WGLC I again received a lot of comments from Dave for editorials and spelling corrections, thanks again for checking, my apologies for not having detected them myself.
>  
> Besides the editorials, Dave commented that the procedures are based very much on the assumption of a underlying network architecture where there is a clear seperation between the UA on the user device and the CC agent/monitor which is located in the network. Dave proposed to better consider the case where the CC agent/monitor is colocated with the UA on the user device. 
> An example is a simple UA uses CC via a AS in the network, and when this UA is not available for CC recall, we said that the CC agent SHALL suspend the CC request. But the suspension policy of a more sophisticated agent of a CC App on a device could be different, therefore it was changed to 'SHOULD be suspended'. There are some other changes in this direction. There are no syntax changes.
>  
> Even though they were contributed post WGLC, in my opinion those changes are very useful for a more comprehensive CC solution, and therefore should be considered. I have provisionally provided a 09 version of the internet draft. You can find the changes at  http://bliss-ietf.org/drafts/diff_ccbs.html
>  
> Your opinions?
>  
>  
> Regards, Martin
>  
>  
> _______________________________________________
> BLISS mailing list
> BLISS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bliss