Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 03 June 2013 20:02 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A948E21F84D4 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:02:49 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -101.307
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.307 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, MISSING_HEADERS=1.292, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YEalVTppk2Mb for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 13:02:35 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6645921E8056 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 12:52:48 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (146.sub-70-197-9.myvzw.com [70.197.9.146]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r53Jqj0G096889 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 19:52:47 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <51ACF407.5000707@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 12:52:39 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/21.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
References: <20130603193601.25935.92180.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <20130603193601.25935.92180.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 03 Jun 2013 19:52:48 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bmwg chair <bmwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, bmwg mailing list <bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 20:02:50 -0000

Thanks guys.

They should all be this easy to sponsor.

joel

On 6/3/13 12:36 PM, The IESG wrote:
> The IESG has approved the following document:
> - 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional
>     testing'
>    (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt) as Informational RFC
>
> This document is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
> Group.
>
> The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise.
>
> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome/
>
>
>
>
> Technical Summary
>
>     Benchmarking Methodologies have always relied on test conditions with
>     constant packet sizes, with the goal of understanding what network
>     device capability has been tested.  Tests with constant packet size
>     reveal device capabilities but differ significantly from the
>     conditions encountered in operational deployment, and so additional
>     tests are sometimes conducted with a mixture of packet sizes, or
>     "IMIX".  The mixture of sizes a networking device will encounter is
>     highly variable and depends on many factors.  An IMIX suited for one
>     networking device and deployment will not be appropriate for another.
>     However, the mix of sizes may be known and the tester may be asked to
>     augment the fixed size tests.  To address this need, and the
>     perpetual goal of specifying repeatable test conditions, this draft
>     defines a way to specify the exact repeating sequence of packet sizes
>     from the usual set of fixed sizes, and other forms of mixed size
>
> Working Group Summary
>
> WG Consensus was smooth after development over a reasonable period of time.
>
> Document Quality
>
> There are many implementations of various test equipment that use IMIX.
>
> Personnel
>
> Who is the Document Shepherd?  Lucien Avramov
> Who is the Responsible Area Director?  Joel Jaeggli
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>