IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Fri, 08 March 2019 09:52 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 56704130EC2 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 01:52:33 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.132
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.132 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, KHOP_DYNAMIC=1.468, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=no autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id FzbBwItcMDKV for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 01:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id BBA69130ECF for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 01:52:31 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049297.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.27/8.16.0.27) with SMTP id x289jPZS030756; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:52:29 -0500
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049297.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2r3g716mjt-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:52:29 -0500
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x289qSQX117721; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 03:52:28 -0600
Received: from zlp30495.vci.att.com (zlp30495.vci.att.com [135.46.181.158]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x289qMNN117605; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 03:52:23 -0600
Received: from zlp30495.vci.att.com (zlp30495.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30495.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 2B4954005669; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.1.46]) by zlp30495.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 0DA6E40B2AB4; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 09:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x289qLhZ030455; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 03:52:21 -0600
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (mail-azure.research.att.com [135.207.255.18]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id x289qEHI029981; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 03:52:15 -0600
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njbdcas1.research.att.com [135.197.255.61]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53FA6E0ABA; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:52:13 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njbdcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::8c6b:4b77:618f:9a01%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0439.000; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 04:51:45 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: WB Lee <leewb@etri.re.kr>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg
Thread-Index: AdTVY9tv7YkGX6MVR5S114UAvq6Y0gAMBg4Q
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:51:52 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF6C001DC5@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <000601d4d565$1dfd26d0$59f77470$@etri.re.kr>
In-Reply-To: <000601d4d565$1dfd26d0$59f77470$@etri.re.kr>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [91.3.168.71]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2019-03-08_08:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=999 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1810050000 definitions=main-1903080070
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/-ZKMBydFxJ-AlChTaZcrkxIGOEs>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 09:52:33 -0000

Thanks for your timely contribution, 
Mr. Lee and co-authors.  
I will certainly take time to review.

Al
bmwg co-chair 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of WB Lee
> Sent: Thursday, March 7, 2019 11:12 PM
> To: bmwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg
> 
> 
> Hi All,
> 
> We have been researched the POD testing in Containerized Infrastructures.
> We submitted the new draft, "Considerations for Benchmarking Network
> Performance in Containerized Infrastructures".
> 
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_id_draft-2Ddcn-2Dbmwg-2Dcontainerized-2Dinfra-
> 2D00.txt&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=GqCJ6KxJEotosmsZYGIRkgzSnPHw6
> 9gsd-qljl5VsKM&s=8TVO-ODX_CHjQHvGlCffATtz0hQeX6HUeog7Q8mGajc&e=
> 
> Abstract
> 
>    This draft describes benchmarking considerations for a containerized
>    infrastructure.  In a containerized infrastructure, Virtualized
>    Network Functions(VNFs) are deployed on operating-system-level
>    virtualization platform by abstracting the user namespace as opposed
>    to virtualization using a hypervisor.  Leveraging this, the system
>    configurations and networking scenarios for VNF benchmarking will be
>    partially changed by way of resource allocation and network port
>    binding between a physical host and VNFs.  In this draft we compare
>    the state of the art in container networking architecture with
>    networking on VM-based virtualized systems, and provide several test
>    scenarios for network performance in containerized infrastructure.
> 
> We welcome any comments.
> 
> Regards,
> Wangbong Lee
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=GqCJ6KxJEotosmsZYGIRkgzSnPHw6
> 9gsd-qljl5VsKM&s=Bw0LUXS-NxJHsEwXDVqXkyG-vuE7YWyeQMbEHEWsGfA&e=

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email