[bmwg] R: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02
Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it> Mon, 03 October 2016 10:19 UTC
Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AC92012B2D3 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 03:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -7.216
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-7.216 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-2.996, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id XzBJH3PlCzci for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 03:19:21 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TELEDG001RM001.telecomitalia.it (teledg001rm001.telecomitalia.it [217.169.121.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 74F1912B386 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 03:15:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from TELMBXA02RM001.telecomitalia.local (10.14.252.26) by TELEDG001RM001.telecomitalia.it (10.19.3.111) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.266.1; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:15:23 +0200
Received: from TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local (10.14.252.27) by TELMBXA02RM001.telecomitalia.local (10.14.252.26) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:15:23 +0200
Received: from TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local ([fe80::2845:411e:c732:e844]) by TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local ([fe80::2845:411e:c732:e844%20]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Mon, 3 Oct 2016 12:15:23 +0200
From: Fioccola Giuseppe <giuseppe.fioccola@telecomitalia.it>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02
Thread-Index: AdIZPRwju56bR0JqSLab9MLQEwkW3ABymFLwAHbbwtAAGgej8A==
Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:15:23 +0000
Message-ID: <a8aa3877668f4c83826f954e566c05f6@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local>
References: <BN6PR05MB29630E74E426155F8EA2AB0CC2CF0@BN6PR05MB2963.namprd05.prod.outlook.com> <8120ae2be5524f1b9dbc81d8ebc92a1b@TELMBXB02RM001.telecomitalia.local> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D459F65C9BB@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D459F65C9BB@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: it-IT, en-US
Content-Language: it-IT
X-MS-Has-Attach: yes
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.14.252.247]
x-ti-disclaimer: Disclaimer1
Content-Type: multipart/related; boundary="_004_a8aa3877668f4c83826f954e566c05f6TELMBXB02RM001telecomit_"; type="multipart/alternative"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/1hX90IQV5DJCaow4nvlQmyygFxE>
Subject: [bmwg] R: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Oct 2016 10:19:24 -0000
Hi Al and BMWG, Thanks for your welcome email. I'm really glad to be part of BMWG. IMHO the purpose of this document could be take into consideration. I'm working for an Operator (Telecom Italia), and the interest for carrier ethernet services (e.g. MEF certified services) is increasing in the last years. ITU-T Y.1731 Performance Monitoring is a key technology to strengthen layer 2 service offers to the customers, based on enhanced QoE and SLAs. So methodologies for benchmarking Y.1731 PM would be useful. Most of my IETF contributions are for now in IPPM WG and I'm subscribed to BMWG mailing list since May. Regards, Giuseppe Da: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Inviato: domenica 2 ottobre 2016 22:04 A: bmwg@ietf.org Oggetto: Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 BMWG, In the last week, we have seen eight single-line messages of support for the subject memo: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02. In the same week, the WG chairs have seen an equal number of new subscriptions to the BMWG mailing list, with high correlation to the messages of support. To those who subscribed, Welcome to BMWG. The WG chairs have not asked the BMWG whether we should adopt this draft (or any other draft) in the last week. The working group has many other chartered items in-progress, and several WG Last Calls to conduct before we meet in Seoul. Therefore, single-line messages of support are nice to hear, but the BMWG is still at the starting point of evaluating the technical content of the draft, and trying to determine whether there is sufficient need in the Industry for the benchmarks as proposed in draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02. Comments along these lines would be useful to the BMWG at this time. Also, to the many new people joining BMWG list: I invite you to introduce yourselves to all other participants. Please tell us a bit about your testing background and interests, what RFCs you currently use in your work, and how you would use draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 (specific use cases would be helpful). thanks and regards, Al bmwg co-chair From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Fioccola Giuseppe Sent: Friday, September 30, 2016 8:27 AM To: Sudhin Jacob; bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Subject: [bmwg] R: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Support this adoption Giuseppe Da: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] Per conto di Sudhin Jacob Inviato: mercoledì 28 settembre 2016 06:04 A: bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Oggetto: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Hi All, We have submitted the latest revision of the draft based on the comments received. We humbly request your support for this draft. Regards, Sudhin Questo messaggio e i suoi allegati sono indirizzati esclusivamente alle persone indicate. La diffusione, copia o qualsiasi altra azione derivante dalla conoscenza di queste informazioni sono rigorosamente vietate. Qualora abbiate ricevuto questo documento per errore siete cortesemente pregati di darne immediata comunicazione al mittente e di provvedere alla sua distruzione, Grazie. This e-mail and any attachments is confidential and may contain privileged information intended for the addressee(s) only. Dissemination, copying, printing or use by anybody else is unauthorised. If you are not the intended recipient, please delete this message and any attachments and advise the sender by return e-mail, Thanks. [rispetta l'ambiente]Rispetta l'ambiente. Non stampare questa mail se non è necessario.
- [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Sudhin Jacob
- [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Rukesh D
- [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Suryateja Reddy Bhavanam
- [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Mohammed Shabeer A S
- [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Matteo Repeti
- Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Lucien Avramov (lavramov)
- [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Manoj Ramalingam
- Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Sudhin Jacob
- Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Sailaja Ganteda
- [bmwg] R: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Fioccola Giuseppe
- Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 joel jaeggli
- [bmwg] R: REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 Fioccola Giuseppe
- Re: [bmwg] REG: draft-jacpra-bmwg-pmtest-02 MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)