IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)

"Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com> Tue, 20 June 2017 16:35 UTC

Return-Path: <aretana@cisco.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 707881293D9; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:35:44 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -14.522
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-14.522 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H3=-0.01, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=-0.01, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, USER_IN_DEF_DKIM_WL=-7.5] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=cisco.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id twe2p0iPrZrp; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:35:42 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com (rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com [173.37.86.75]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher DHE-RSA-SEED-SHA (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4D249131B9D; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 09:35:27 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=cisco.com; i=@cisco.com; l=5832; q=dns/txt; s=iport; t=1497976527; x=1499186127; h=from:to:cc:subject:date:message-id:references: in-reply-to:mime-version; bh=asYkaCZc1XyMjcaegvPj75kFvmKteTxdpbd+uRd9VO4=; b=ZrccDElIrU5YSPAu6mIW0HhU1MHOABntTlR3WOmuEHZxkJB6+BNF712R NopuQUOX5RcWYKEOs0cbSOpM2sPTHK6rzR5/lBvuMpLL4pIGZkvVMJPgP /oq6c0i3XhPxzX/bhCH5x+5CDU4kztTji3DHxif8ljGea5+by58uXIvJY M=;
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Filtered: true
X-IronPort-Anti-Spam-Result: A0B1AQAdTklZ/4cNJK1dGgEBAQECAQEBAQgBAQEBgm9pYoENB4NkihmRf5BOhSqBMgNchiQCGoJMPxgBAgEBAQEBAQFrKIUZAQQBI1YFCwIBCD8DAgICMBQRAgQOBYlIXAisDYImKosvAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBAQEBHYZsgWArgnmHezCCMQWXHIdFApNgkg6VDAEfOEw+dBVbAYUvgU12iEyBDQEBAQ
X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="5.39,364,1493683200"; d="scan'208,217";a="260263500"
Received: from alln-core-2.cisco.com ([173.36.13.135]) by rcdn-iport-4.cisco.com with ESMTP/TLS/DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA; 20 Jun 2017 16:35:26 +0000
Received: from XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (xch-aln-005.cisco.com [173.36.7.15]) by alln-core-2.cisco.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v5KGZQ3E031579 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=FAIL); Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:35:26 GMT
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com (173.36.7.12) by XCH-ALN-005.cisco.com (173.36.7.15) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 15.0.1210.3; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:35:25 -0500
Received: from xch-aln-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) by XCH-ALN-002.cisco.com ([173.36.7.12]) with mapi id 15.00.1210.000; Tue, 20 Jun 2017 11:35:25 -0500
From: "Alvaro Retana (aretana)" <aretana@cisco.com>
To: Lucien Avramov <lucienav@google.com>
CC: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology@ietf.org>, Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>, "bmwg-chairs@ietf.org" <bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHS6UORi83ftabEaky9N6fUtwLWHqItR1qAgAEh4wA=
Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:35:25 +0000
Message-ID: <D78D2206-5A27-40E3-9E29-8C4A8D1ABD01@cisco.com>
References: <149790794238.10693.2532866777748124406.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <CALTEt=C9pzd4w9HjstXjzbj6awbdhTR66CF=H75O_39q0NK_iA@mail.gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <CALTEt=C9pzd4w9HjstXjzbj6awbdhTR66CF=H75O_39q0NK_iA@mail.gmail.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
user-agent: Microsoft-MacOutlook/f.20.0.170309
x-ms-exchange-messagesentrepresentingtype: 1
x-ms-exchange-transport-fromentityheader: Hosted
x-originating-ip: [10.61.241.68]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_D78D22065A2740E39E298C4A8D1ABD01ciscocom_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/2Bol5-u6-SkHnrHx_blXbrGojNo>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's Discuss on draft-ietf-bmwg-dcbench-methodology-12: (with DISCUSS and COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 16:35:44 -0000

On 6/20/17, 3:17 AM, "Lucien Avramov" <lucienav@google.com<mailto:lucienav@google.com>> wrote:

Lucien:

Hi!

> In the context of the tests we describe in this publication, it's key to keep
> the words we have chosen…

I don’t have a problem with the words themselves – the point of my DISCUSS is the fact that each word (“MUST”, for example) has two different definitions.  Yes, they are close, but different.  In fact, they are so close that I think you could take out the definitions in 1.2 and not lose anything.

Regards,

Alvaro.

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email