Re: [bmwg] I-D Update

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Sun, 19 July 2015 09:25 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A822D1AC3D3 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:25:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -4.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_HELO_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 549IkqyvnZva for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [204.178.8.22]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 53D301A8F44 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 02:25:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.255.18]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9F21120BB8; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:48:41 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg0.research.att.com [135.207.240.40]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A145BE081A; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:25:38 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90]) by NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com ([fe80::108a:1006:9f54:fd90%25]) with mapi; Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:25:38 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: GEORGESCU LIVIU MARIUS <liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 05:25:35 -0400
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] I-D Update
Thread-Index: AdDBZ7XSkNuJDob9Q76tc/Yn5rhPgAAnK48w
Message-ID: <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0664968D91@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com>
References: <001001d0b4b3$07cf5bc0$176e1340$@is.naist.jp> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0662C6EB9D@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> <6c50cc853332.559e9f23@naist.jp> <6c50c9d1152a.559e9f61@naist.jp> <6c50c989b4c.559e9fa0@naist.jp> <6c00c5755e55.559eca66@naist.jp> <4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D066299F230@NJFPSRVEXG0.research.att.com> <6bc0f4368375.55aa6397@naist.jp> <6bc0b226aec1.55aa63d4@naist.jp> <6b50ee8585e9.55aa6412@naist.jp> <6b70cdc89fb5.55aa6450@naist.jp> <6b70a01c95df.55aa648e@naist.jp> <6b70b8ed9db8.55aa64cc@naist.jp> <6b709d7a9bf2.55aa6546@naist.jp> <6b70c13f9952.55aae3e2@naist.jp>
In-Reply-To: <6b70c13f9952.55aae3e2@naist.jp>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4AF73AA205019A4C8A1DDD32C034631D0664968D91NJFPSRVEXG0re_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/2a6-CZfw54ITDpvM9Mgqs3K9Dg0>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] I-D Update
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 19 Jul 2015 09:25:41 -0000

Hi Marius,
<participant/> Thanks for your comments!
<chair_hat/> Thanks for keeping up with *draft-a-week* reviews!
the city of 1K spires is calling,
Al

From: GEORGESCU LIVIU MARIUS [mailto:liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp]
Sent: Saturday, July 18, 2015 10:40 AM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bmwg] I-D Update

Hello Al,

If it's just spelling, it's satisfying enough in my opinion.
I noticed you are using it in other contexts as well (e.g. VNF draft) and was wondering if it was supposed to have a different meaning than "scalability".
In the spirit of a draft-a-week, here are my comments for the draft https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-ietf-bmwg-virtual-net-00.txt.
Please find attached a txt version. I marked my comments with ###MG .

Best regards,
Marius

On 07/10/15, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com<mailto:acmorton@att.com>> wrote:
Hi Marius,
I typed "scaleability" late last night, and spell check didn't object, so I kept going...
simple explanation, but not satisfying,
Al
________________________________________

From: GEORGESCU LIVIU MARIUS [liviumarius-g@is.naist.jp]
Sent: Thursday, July 09, 2015 12:24 PM
To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL); bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: RE: [bmwg] I-D Update

Dear Al,

Thank you very much for the very detailed review. All the comments are relevant and I will attempt to answer them in the next version.
One question though, why do you use the spelling "scaleability" ?

Best regards,
Marius

On 07/09/15, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com<mailto:acmorton@att.com>> wrote:
Hi Marius,

Attached, please find a few suggestions for your draft.
search for ACM:

Thanks for seeking and implementing the many comments so far!
regards,
Al
(as a participant)

From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marius Georgescu
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 6:37 AM
To: bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: [bmwg] I-D Update

Dear BMWG Members,

I hope my e-mail finds you well. Please find below a link to the latest update of the draft I’ve been working on:
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-georgescu-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-01

The biggest change and probably the most debatable is the addition of the Delay variation (jitter) subsection under Benchmarking tests (Section 6.3), following the comments received during the IETF92 meeting.  I would like to take this opportunity to thank all the people that supported and provided feedback for this draft so far and to ask for more ☺.

Best regards,
Marius