Re: [bmwg] bmwg Digest, Vol 153, Issue 25

One would hope that an author is committed to review what they write :-)

I am personally on the fence for this draft at this point.

Why would EVPN need a specific benchmark to start with, that is different
from standard benchmarking tools and techniques?

On Tue, Jun 20, 2017 at 8:17 PM, Sudhin Jacob <sjacob@juniper.net> wrote:

> Hi Al,
>
> As an author of the draft. Let me answer the question.
>
> whether you commit to reviewing the WG document if adopted?
>
> Yes. I am committed to review the draft, if adopted.
>
> Regards,
> Sudhin
>
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> bmwg-request@ietf.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2017 12:30 AM
> To: bmwg@ietf.org
> Subject: bmwg Digest, Vol 153, Issue 25
>
> Send bmwg mailing list submissions to
>         bmwg@ietf.org
>
> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit
>         https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to
>         bmwg-request@ietf.org
>
> You can reach the person managing the list at
>         bmwg-owner@ietf.org
>
> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific than
> "Re: Contents of bmwg digest..."
>
>
> Today's Topics:
>
>    1. Re: Call For Adoption: draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-07
>       (MORTON, ALFRED C (AL))
>
>
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
> Message: 1
> Date: Tue, 20 Jun 2017 18:43:18 +0000
> From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
> To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] Call For Adoption: draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-07
> Message-ID:
>         <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF25FE116A@njmtexg5.research.
> att.com>
> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
>
> BMWG,
>
> So far, I count about eight people who offered support for the draft, and
> one person who made a technical comment along with their message.
>
> *No one* has answered this question:
> >
> > (3) whether you commit to reviewing the WG document if adopted
> >
>
> With no commitments to review the draft and provide the necessary
> expertise to develop appropriate benchmarks for our industry, it will not
> be appropriate to add a milestone to our charter (or re-charter, if
> necessary).
>
> There is still time for everyone to reconsider their position, and provide
> an answer to the question above.  The WGLC closes on Friday 23 June 2017.
>
> thanks for your consideration,
> Al
> bmwg co-chair
>
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of MORTON, ALFRED
> > C
> > (AL)
> > Sent: Saturday, June 03, 2017 6:34 PM
> > To: bmwg@ietf.org
> > Subject: [bmwg] Call For Adoption: draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-07
> >
> > *** Security Advisory: This Message Originated Outside of AT&T ***.
> > Reference http://cso.att.com/EmailSecurity/IDSP.html for more
> > information.
> >
> > BMWG,
> >
> > At our Chicago meeting, the BMWG reviewed a version of the Internet
> > Draft on
> >
> > Benchmarking Methodology for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
> > draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-05
> >
> > There was sufficient readership present at the meeting and
> > positive/constructive comments on the work, so the chairs asked
> > whether support existed to adopt the draft as a WG item. There was
> > support and no objections. As always, such decisions are officially
> > taken on the mailing list.
> >
> > This message*, therefore, starts a call for adoption on:
> >
> > Benchmarking Methodology for EVPN and PBB-EVPN
> > draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-07
> >
> > to run until Friday 23 June 2017.
> >
> > Please reply to bmwg@ietf.org indicating:
> >
> > (1) whether you support addition of the following milestone to
> >    the BMWG charter:
> >
> > date TBD: Benchmarking Methodology for EVPN and PBB-EVPN to the IESG
> >
> > (2) whether you support the adoption of draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpntest-07
> >    as the basis document for this milestone
> >
> > (3) whether you commit to reviewing the WG document if adopted
> >
> > We are aware that BMWG has nearly completed all its existing chartered
> > items.  This usually begins discussion of re-chartering, this time
> > with Warren (our new AD Advisor). The final decision/schedule for
> > adoption will depend on these discussions.
> >
> > thanks for your consideration of the draft, and regards,
> >
> > Al
> > bmwg co-chair
> >
> > *using Brian Trammell's recent message to IPPM as a template (thanks!)
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > bmwg mailing list
> > bmwg@ietf.org
> > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
> > 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
> > o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=3tXKQNBR8Q4HC7BBx6pc5me8u
> > 9z Ne9QVo_owOF5-ciM&s=xIKgDP2zI9F0IvfisGlEBjIij3I_H95zkVWWJGP8zlg&e=
>
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> Subject: Digest Footer
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>
>
> ------------------------------
>
> End of bmwg Digest, Vol 153, Issue 25
> *************************************
>
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>