Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00.txt

Scott Poretsky <sporetsky@avici.com> Thu, 24 July 2003 17:35 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17198 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:35:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19fjzZ-0001n0-L1; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:35:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19fjyl-0001mT-Ec for bmwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:34:11 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA17167 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:34:07 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19fjyj-0000EW-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:34:09 -0400
Received: from [12.38.212.174] (helo=mailhost.avici.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19fjyY-0000EE-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:33:58 -0400
Received: from sporetsky-lt.avici.com ([10.2.104.35]) by mailhost.avici.com (8.12.8/8.12.8) with ESMTP id h6OHXSb9010994; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:33:29 -0400
Message-Id: <5.0.2.1.2.20030724133147.02ebbeb0@pop.avici.com>
X-Sender: sporetsky@pop.avici.com
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 5.0.2
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:35:59 -0400
To: Thomas Eriksson <thomas.a.eriksson@teliasonera.com>, bmwg@ietf.org
From: Scott Poretsky <sporetsky@avici.com>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00.txt
In-Reply-To: <5.2.1.1.0.20030724161420.02187be8@tmspop.telia.se>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format=flowed
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

At 05:04 PM 7/24/2003 +0200, Thomas Eriksson wrote:
>Here are some comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00.txt.
>
>The draft is focusing mainly on convergence time when things break. It may 
>also be interesting to study the convergence time when traffic goes from 
>backup path to preferred path.

Absolutely!  I believe this is covered with test case "4.1.5 Convergence 
Due to Cost Change".  Would you like an additional test case?


>An interesting test case is when ECMP is used on the SUT and we want to 
>benchmark convergence time. I do not think that the current methodology 
>will work for this case because some traffic will go over the "backup 
>path" as well. This could be fixed by measuring the traffic on the 
>"prefered path" and when this traffic is rerouted to the "backup path" 
>calculate convergence time based on that. I am not sure however is if is 
>possible to produce comparable results when using ECMP ? (I guess it 
>somewhat implementation dependent function).

Great suggestion.  We will add a test case for measuring convergence on 
ECMP links.

Thanks,
Scott


>Thomas
>
>
>_______________________________________________
>bmwg mailing list
>bmwg@ietf.org
>https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg



_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg