Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)

joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com> Mon, 03 June 2013 21:21 UTC

Return-Path: <joelja@bogus.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id ED8EE21F84D9 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:21:22 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -102.276
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.276 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.323, BAYES_00=-2.599, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id v0E26BGoyCgp for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:21:07 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from nagasaki.bogus.com (nagasaki.bogus.com [IPv6:2001:418:1::81]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1809B11E80EE for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:15:43 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from joels-MacBook-Air.local (146.sub-70-197-9.myvzw.com [70.197.9.146]) (authenticated bits=0) by nagasaki.bogus.com (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id r53LFagj097937 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA bits=256 verify=NOT); Mon, 3 Jun 2013 21:15:37 GMT (envelope-from joelja@bogus.com)
Message-ID: <51AD0772.8000702@bogus.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 14:15:30 -0700
From: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.8; rv:21.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/21.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
References: <20130603193601.25935.92180.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB72D@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com> <51ACFDA6.5070005@bogus.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB765@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB765@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Sender succeeded SMTP AUTH, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.2.7 (nagasaki.bogus.com [147.28.0.81]); Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:15:39 +0000 (UTC)
Cc: bmwg chair <bmwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, bmwg mailing list <bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:21:23 -0000

On 6/3/13 2:05 PM, MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> I just checked the IESG evaluation record, and there are a few
> more comments I'll try to include in the revision.
I've put it in ad followup needed.

if you're going to do another edit please do so quickly.
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com]
>> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 4:34 PM
>> To: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise
>> Cc: bmwg chair; bmwg mailing list
>> Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of
>> variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-
>> ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
>>
>> On 6/3/13 12:55 PM, MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
>>> Hey Joel,  we agreed to several changes that have only appeared in
>>> a preliminary version (the diffs I sent to Benoit in reply to comments).
>>>
>>> I need to upload the revised version ASAP, I suppose...
>> yes
>>> Al
>>>
>>>> -----Original Message-----
>>>> From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
>>>> The IESG
>>>> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:36 PM
>>>> To: IETF-Announce
>>>> Cc: bmwg chair; bmwg mailing list; RFC Editor
>>>> Subject: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of
>> variable
>>>> packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-
>>>> bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
>>>>
>>>> The IESG has approved the following document:
>>>> - 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional
>>>>      testing'
>>>>     (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt) as Informational RFC
>>>>
>>>> This document is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
>>>> Group.
>>>>
>>>> The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise.
>>>>
>>>> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
>>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Technical Summary
>>>>
>>>>      Benchmarking Methodologies have always relied on test conditions
>> with
>>>>      constant packet sizes, with the goal of understanding what network
>>>>      device capability has been tested.  Tests with constant packet size
>>>>      reveal device capabilities but differ significantly from the
>>>>      conditions encountered in operational deployment, and so additional
>>>>      tests are sometimes conducted with a mixture of packet sizes, or
>>>>      "IMIX".  The mixture of sizes a networking device will encounter is
>>>>      highly variable and depends on many factors.  An IMIX suited for
>> one
>>>>      networking device and deployment will not be appropriate for
>> another.
>>>>      However, the mix of sizes may be known and the tester may be asked
>> to
>>>>      augment the fixed size tests.  To address this need, and the
>>>>      perpetual goal of specifying repeatable test conditions, this draft
>>>>      defines a way to specify the exact repeating sequence of packet
>> sizes
>>>>      from the usual set of fixed sizes, and other forms of mixed size
>>>>
>>>> Working Group Summary
>>>>
>>>> WG Consensus was smooth after development over a reasonable period of
>>>> time.
>>>>
>>>> Document Quality
>>>>
>>>> There are many implementations of various test equipment that use IMIX.
>>>>
>>>> Personnel
>>>>
>>>> Who is the Document Shepherd?  Lucien Avramov
>>>> Who is the Responsible Area Director?  Joel Jaeggli
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> _______________________________________________
>>>> bmwg mailing list
>>>> bmwg@ietf.org
>>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
>