[bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance
"Adrian Farrel" <adrian@olddog.co.uk> Sun, 18 October 2015 15:19 UTC
Return-Path: <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7620B1A8AAC; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:19:26 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -99.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-99.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_50=0.8, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oCmcKtma0dJh; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (asmtp1.iomartmail.com [62.128.201.248]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0C5E11A8AAA; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 08:19:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from asmtp1.iomartmail.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t9IFJKKm001840; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:19:20 +0100
Received: from 950129200 (79.135.99.37.dsl.gradwelldsl.co.uk [79.135.99.37] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by asmtp1.iomartmail.com (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id t9IFJJSU001834 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:19:20 +0100
From: Adrian Farrel <adrian@olddog.co.uk>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 16:19:21 +0100
Message-ID: <006d01d109b8$5dbaf120$1930d360$@olddog.co.uk>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdEJt6+16GzWpCoBQdikkjQmR6Q75g==
Content-Language: en-gb
X-TM-AS-MML: disable
X-TM-AS-Product-Ver: IMSS-7.1.0.1679-8.0.0.1202-21888.001
X-TM-AS-Result: No--2.907-10.0-31-10
X-imss-scan-details: No--2.907-10.0-31-10
X-TMASE-MatchedRID: CuNqLv8MpA0ECY7bP/j9qLheLJw6tpfxnophrTcsI7bfUZT83lbkEJRW 6398OQ0I8kJKPvReuFUPALdO5jTW8VvQ2lxoUSXg4h8r8l3l4eZ9LQinZ4QefL6qvLNjDYTwfyj BJDnutUhQSFbL1bvQASdET58jp62SWQHrLGVYdcczxHHLjrWDBx726YUs0dxnaynJ/QWoZvSrUX oW0b7CcQkCnkA3h/n1D701dfVAizuSL9OvtUca/e6+D482nHhrnqg/VrSZEiM=
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/9QP6iGkiZZfTz6HsttnjHywpnuM>
Cc: sdn@irtf.org
Subject: [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
Reply-To: adrian@olddog.co.uk
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 15:19:26 -0000
Hi, It surprises me that draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term makes no reference to RFC 7426 but instead defines its own terminology. Why is that? Thanks, Adrian -- Read my latest... Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales http://www.feedaread.com/books/Tales-from-the-Wood-9781786100924.aspx http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924 Or buy from me direct.
- [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controlle… Adrian Farrel
- Re: [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Contr… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Contr… Bhuvan (Veryx Technologies)