Re: [bmwg] Meeting Minutes Review: IPsec Terminology

Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu> Wed, 29 October 2003 00:24 UTC

Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA10505 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:24:19 -0500 (EST)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AEe81-0005gk-4w; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:24:01 -0500
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 1AEe79-0005bj-9O for bmwg@optimus.ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:23:07 -0500
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id TAA10475 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:22:55 -0500 (EST)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AEe77-0003kJ-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:23:05 -0500
Received: from newdev.eecs.harvard.edu ([140.247.60.212] helo=newdev.harvard.edu) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 1AEe77-0003kG-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:23:05 -0500
Received: from newdev.harvard.edu (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.12.9/8.12.2) with ESMTP id h9T0Mw6U005812; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:22:58 -0500 (EST)
Received: (from sob@localhost) by newdev.harvard.edu (8.12.9/8.12.2/Submit) id h9T0MwSP005811; Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:22:58 -0500 (EST)
Date: Tue, 28 Oct 2003 19:22:58 -0500 (EST)
From: Scott Bradner <sob@harvard.edu>
Message-Id: <200310290022.h9T0MwSP005811@newdev.harvard.edu>
To: herckt@cisco.com, sob@harvard.edu
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Meeting Minutes Review: IPsec Terminology
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
In-Reply-To: <3F9F07B0.3040909@cisco.com>
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>

> Would you agree that we try a middleground solution where we stay away 
> from IMIX and redefine -a- general mix where we only suggest a potential 
> mix format but require the mix to be reported in any of the documented 
> results.

if you mean a concurrent mix of sizes that I think we will just
agree to disagree - if you mean a sequence of sizes then I'm in that camp

Scott

_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg