Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)

"MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Mon, 03 June 2013 21:11 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E681421E80AD for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:11:18 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qg0rMRkRAi8J for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:11:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4260821E80BE for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:05:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4D8DA1204A2; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:05:44 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com [135.207.177.33]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id DAAFDEFC1A; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:05:45 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299]) by njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299%11]) with mapi; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:05:45 -0400
From: "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:05:44 -0400
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
Thread-Index: Ac5gma0faofqV4JTSU2/dJSaqnwmrwABDR1A
Message-ID: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB765@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
References: <20130603193601.25935.92180.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB72D@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com> <51ACFDA6.5070005@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <51ACFDA6.5070005@bogus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: bmwg chair <bmwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, bmwg mailing list <bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:11:19 -0000

I just checked the IESG evaluation record, and there are a few
more comments I'll try to include in the revision.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 4:34 PM
> To: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise
> Cc: bmwg chair; bmwg mailing list
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of
> variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-
> ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
> 
> On 6/3/13 12:55 PM, MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> > Hey Joel,  we agreed to several changes that have only appeared in
> > a preliminary version (the diffs I sent to Benoit in reply to comments).
> >
> > I need to upload the revised version ASAP, I suppose...
> yes
> > Al
> >
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of
> >> The IESG
> >> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:36 PM
> >> To: IETF-Announce
> >> Cc: bmwg chair; bmwg mailing list; RFC Editor
> >> Subject: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of
> variable
> >> packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-
> >> bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
> >>
> >> The IESG has approved the following document:
> >> - 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional
> >>     testing'
> >>    (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt) as Informational RFC
> >>
> >> This document is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
> >> Group.
> >>
> >> The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise.
> >>
> >> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> >> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome/
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >> Technical Summary
> >>
> >>     Benchmarking Methodologies have always relied on test conditions
> with
> >>     constant packet sizes, with the goal of understanding what network
> >>     device capability has been tested.  Tests with constant packet size
> >>     reveal device capabilities but differ significantly from the
> >>     conditions encountered in operational deployment, and so additional
> >>     tests are sometimes conducted with a mixture of packet sizes, or
> >>     "IMIX".  The mixture of sizes a networking device will encounter is
> >>     highly variable and depends on many factors.  An IMIX suited for
> one
> >>     networking device and deployment will not be appropriate for
> another.
> >>     However, the mix of sizes may be known and the tester may be asked
> to
> >>     augment the fixed size tests.  To address this need, and the
> >>     perpetual goal of specifying repeatable test conditions, this draft
> >>     defines a way to specify the exact repeating sequence of packet
> sizes
> >>     from the usual set of fixed sizes, and other forms of mixed size
> >>
> >> Working Group Summary
> >>
> >> WG Consensus was smooth after development over a reasonable period of
> >> time.
> >>
> >> Document Quality
> >>
> >> There are many implementations of various test equipment that use IMIX.
> >>
> >> Personnel
> >>
> >> Who is the Document Shepherd?  Lucien Avramov
> >> Who is the Responsible Area Director?  Joel Jaeggli
> >>
> >>
> >> _______________________________________________
> >> bmwg mailing list
> >> bmwg@ietf.org
> >> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg