[bmwg] <draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-00.txt>
Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net> Thu, 18 September 2003 13:13 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA10301 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:13:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19zyak-0003x1-1h; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:13:02 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19zyaZ-0003wE-5H for bmwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:12:51 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id JAA10290 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:12:43 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19zyaX-0005aS-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:12:49 -0400
Received: from natint2.juniper.net ([207.17.136.150] helo=merlot.juniper.net) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19zyaX-0005aK-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:12:49 -0400
Received: from juniper.net (ssh3.juniper.net [207.17.136.47]) by merlot.juniper.net (8.11.3/8.11.3) with ESMTP id h8IDCIj33626 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 18 Sep 2003 06:12:18 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from kdubray@juniper.net)
Message-ID: <3F69AF31.1040500@juniper.net>
Date: Thu, 18 Sep 2003 09:12:17 -0400
From: Kevin Dubray <kdubray@juniper.net>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.0; en-US; rv:1.0.2) Gecko/20021120 Netscape/7.01 (CK-SillyDog)
X-Accept-Language: en-us, en
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Subject: [bmwg] <draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-00.txt>
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Hi, I infer from the minutes of the Vienna meeting post by Al to this list, that Failure/Error definitions are in the works for this I-D. Yes? To me, these definitions are critical for any testing having to do with reliability. Which brings me to my next question, what separates the scope of this work from reliability testing? -Kevin _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- [bmwg] <draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-00.txt> Kevin Dubray
- Re: [bmwg] <draft-ietf-bmwg-acc-bench-term-00.txt> s.poretsky