Re: [bmwg] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)

Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro> Thu, 08 June 2017 07:03 UTC

Return-Path: <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id EE6C41201F8; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 00:03:02 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rcs-rds.ro
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id c2NsrSLt8A7R; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 00:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailproxy5.rcs-rds.ro (mailproxy5.rcs-rds.ro [212.54.124.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 34B8A1292F5; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 00:03:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.172.5.198] (unknown [10.172.5.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailproxy5.rcs-rds.ro (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id E715C28315A; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:02:58 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rcs-rds.ro; s=MailProxy; t=1496905378; bh=2tozZIz603ib/M+rHz0SaSsFMY25vhERp4Tg30hUJqo=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=q33fx/ny+s0d8KvjsgttR4RFRrUX2AJv9W8+2qi+vXIDF7CHbCcyq/igAtB+Wli9p 8BqBX1QB4RN7v5BYwuMfiGm7q2fabGtSwzu5UN0SruxNi+m3Y1q5jBGsQ84+hznc6s KvdAFK6yuFtEqvklS+nS5YCbO6ATtSzSwCSezoTI=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro>
In-Reply-To: <149687655097.25630.10122076655027013893.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 10:02:55 +0300
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org, Alfred C Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <E664951E-154E-4F6F-834A-BFDD0A980325@rcs-rds.ro>
References: <149687655097.25630.10122076655027013893.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/HfjPEuyOa_h9euT6J6p40FmjYh8>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 07:03:03 -0000

Hello Adam,

Thank you for your review.
Our intention was to include the most forward looking (popular) IPv6 transition technologies in the list. 
Moreover, when starting the draft, teredo was towards the end of its "shelf life".
We can note in the Introduction that the list is not exhaustive.

Best regards,
Marius
 
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 2:02 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I was surprised not to find any mention of RFC 4380 (Teredo) in this document.
> If its omission was intentional, a statement to that effect (say, in the
> introduction) is probably warranted.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg