[bmwg] Final edits on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking

[Warren Kumari <[e-mail]>]

Hi there,

Your document was on the IESG telechat today, and is now in Approved,
Point Raised raised state. It doesn't strictly **need** a revised ID,
but I do think that incorporating these helpful comments /
clarifications.

Alia thinks it could do with an informative reference for baby jumbo
frames, and says that she has provided a helpful to Al. I think that
it would be useful to include that, and, while you are editing it,
also address Alvaro and Adam's points (they are simply
clarifications).

Please explicitly let me know once done, and I can finish the
approval, and ship it to the RFC ed.

W

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf