[bmwg] Final edits on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Thu, 08 June 2017 18:34 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1BC9012EB45 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:34:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id QLRBBbDPyYBY for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:34:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-ua0-x232.google.com (mail-ua0-x232.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400c:c08::232]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 94DCC12EB39 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-ua0-x232.google.com with SMTP id h39so23688443uaa.3 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:32:34 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=m85O34Jh+nVCRPsbfeARcI/Oz+1Q7Ch2kTKXoWSd5Y0=; b=KAAzlnRhey7JsmrzsrlPETkaNevkPASnyCEaETdFstiimMnRIvE35PubrlSow2bbiJ nEjWkcObMRvfklE6SR6uUcmy8C5YcFxUyYVE95lE3y4cnJR+p6cunzfuQnO1dPzm+/SU gLMSN2XNNAkfN3fCrcUjgESFdcoKWbm+cFS0nNY+++ZNyd9rLOKHqhi8Rz3Q/+TioMUu HLWf9i5KBoOgQpGby039kVNv/kRGf/r/GFQ7Y+yiVsy0CjrLYViiNwJFXTOjbieFxmd4 5dyZYGPrntlqduNcpByRSeKN17seFF0iwHxcSey9cykRbHrQ1dJf+Gy8sMhVuafFOWZj 5nEQ==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:from:date:message-id:subject:to; bh=m85O34Jh+nVCRPsbfeARcI/Oz+1Q7Ch2kTKXoWSd5Y0=; b=crOmIoA8upniw2SYTOlw+8O+jUsldgqKmJw7ManvmKQmsq0Eoxi8tGoK4em6oWRC+0 MJM0l6EPG2nc6y0PrvfRqqEBZxRPSCy3WZ5mQiUhgNzUWoMpy9CFzCQ0AVaRSKjwaXQ4 jhwftgDlMKJ389MbiB26Rx9eE/oLkrrtOox+nCi2Yahg8GjB7HekqaPzhyX1Wjrqye/v M71p0MJMvOJ4uc9dBLE4JOmry6eA8KgJ/N8diOnCM6ncDqv0OzQgmdvfxaD4V52oXoG+ HGusujy5kZFkD5SndnKboEaCA0Aw5RqQ94hJbwZxcAn7XBj6piJXJM/RF9BPrViLwYmQ 4hIw==
X-Gm-Message-State: AODbwcBh5aNNp4ZjNWsZoM1VoG3eOJhwxV87Rvb49ytNS0tzbJuPTkL6 mRRCeZPNzQXa2+bZQ2JBah6JgVTMvT16qnE=
X-Received: by 10.176.92.71 with SMTP id a7mr18696771uag.155.1496946753568; Thu, 08 Jun 2017 11:32:33 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.176.82.198 with HTTP; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 11:31:53 -0700 (PDT)
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 14:31:53 -0400
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iJ8Q+6bmz7=ZXaFNH5ofOweM8uhCh-r=HffUjkGw1dMEg@mail.gmail.com>
To: draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/HrXxYKnZgR-5EPDwVEVoctxaSnE>
Subject: [bmwg] Final edits on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 18:34:20 -0000

Hi there,

Your document was on the IESG telechat today, and is now in Approved,
Point Raised raised state. It doesn't strictly **need** a revised ID,
but I do think that incorporating these helpful comments /
clarifications.

Alia thinks it could do with an informative reference for baby jumbo
frames, and says that she has provided a helpful to Al. I think that
it would be useful to include that, and, while you are editing it,
also address Alvaro and Adam's points (they are simply
clarifications).

Please explicitly let me know once done, and I can finish the
approval, and ship it to the RFC ed.

W

-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf