[bmwg] Adam Roach's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)

Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 01:27 UTC

Return-Path: <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CF84112708C; Tue, 8 May 2018 18:27:34 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152582925482.2839.8808848403708037971.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Tue, 08 May 2018 18:27:34 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/IHM2M4EjSC8i21RlsnTgsuvzzfs>
Subject: [bmwg] Adam Roach's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 01:27:35 -0000

Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bmwg/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I'm good with this going forward without external review.

On the milestones: "Aug 2018 - Methodology for Next-Gen Firewall Benchmarking
to IESG Review" seems pretty aspirational, given that the WG has not yet
adopted an associated document.