Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest
Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com> Fri, 26 April 2019 10:45 UTC
Return-Path: <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 61BBD1203AA for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 03:45:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.21
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id oEO1W5L27VKv for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 03:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from huawei.com (lhrrgout.huawei.com [185.176.76.210]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 6848B1200A4 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 03:45:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com (unknown [172.18.7.107]) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id 760CEA5D782A4E3397EC; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:45:24 +0100 (IST)
Received: from lhreml507-mbb.china.huawei.com ([10.201.109.48]) by LHREML714-CAH.china.huawei.com ([10.201.108.37]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Fri, 26 Apr 2019 11:45:22 +0100
From: Giuseppe Fioccola <giuseppe.fioccola@huawei.com>
To: Rukesh D <rukeshd=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>, Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest
Thread-Index: AQHU88JiV/NVrtdXwE+dJApI/VHS36ZKZaMAgAPrfUA=
Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:45:21 +0000
Message-ID: <E92F9C7E59A8854E8BED73140B879B4E011D0A21@lhreml507-mbb>
References: <78868FB3-1995-43EE-ADF9-66F30C5F7CC3@encrypted.net> <4A38FE77-B59C-410D-9EB4-FD5D2D4E2346@encrypted.net> <E643E569-0239-4D06-8B0D-0943E51795A0@encrypted.net> <92D3D9A9-C694-4777-AD0E-413867A531B7@juniper.net>
In-Reply-To: <92D3D9A9-C694-4777-AD0E-413867A531B7@juniper.net>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [10.204.62.159]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_E92F9C7E59A8854E8BED73140B879B4E011D0A21lhreml507mbb_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/JYwD0KWgYq9fvv-acg0YZ4veuIs>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 26 Apr 2019 10:45:29 -0000
Hi All, I have read the draft and support it. I also gave some inputs to the initial versions of the document. Best Regards, Giuseppe From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Rukesh D Sent: Wednesday, 24 April 2019 07:48 To: Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net>; bmwg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest I went through the draft. It covers all the fail-over scenarios and bench-marks the convergence of traffic. These test cases are highly needed for any deployment. As and when, new enhancements are implemented, these test cases helps to benchmark. I support this draft. Thanks, Rukesh From: bmwg <bmwg-bounces@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org>> on behalf of Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net<mailto:sbanks@encrypted.net>> Date: Monday, April 15, 2019 at 12:35 PM To: "bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>" <bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>> Subject: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest Hello, I'd sent this first wGLC for draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest before Christmas, and while I gave it a longer period of time for comments, we've received none. So, I'd like to send it through WGLC again, ending Tuesday, April 30. Please share your comments and feedback here on the list. Thanks Sarah On Dec 7, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net<mailto:sbanks@encrypted.net>> wrote: Hi BMWG, A quick clarification. The WGLC is for the Internet-Draft describing a benchmarking methodology for EVPN and PBB-EVPN, NOT BGP Basic Convergence. My apologies for the incorrect cut/paste. The draft link below is incorrect as well; data tracker no longer references full links with versions, so please use: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbmwg-2Devpntest&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=-Fw_mkMknnnzG75PI-IW-3TAGj_ULFyl1NV500P8GO4&m=pUSdrtixtwJk7MQqMFHYBrdZQ05JhQw4pG21lfMvsJE&s=M6ppgXmPQvq1cOqifUTwKYR-FQK61QvTwH2UIR9Z0tg&e=> And note that the current version as of this email/time of writing is -01. Thanks, Sarah On Dec 7, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Sarah B <sbanks@encrypted.net<mailto:sbanks@encrypted.net>> wrote: Hello BMWG, A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) period for the Internet-Draft describing BGP Basic convergence: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest-01<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbmwg-2Devpntest-2D01&d=DwMFAg&c=HAkYuh63rsuhr6Scbfh0UjBXeMK-ndb3voDTXcWzoCI&r=-Fw_mkMknnnzG75PI-IW-3TAGj_ULFyl1NV500P8GO4&m=pUSdrtixtwJk7MQqMFHYBrdZQ05JhQw4pG21lfMvsJE&s=KJWRvvAGZbQov7LUZSD8s5l2GG7A-WFqrKb5CXIHQIA&e=> will be open for 6 weeks from today, and close on January 18, 2019. This is a bit longer of a WGLC window, but accommodates the end of year interruptions some members might experience. Please weigh in on whether or not you feel that this Internet-Draft should be given to the Area Directors for consideration to progressing as an Informational RFC. Send your comments to this list. Your timely and prompt review and feedback is greatly appreciated! Kind regards, Sarah/Al BMWG co-chairs _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- [bmwg] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/… Sarah B
- Re: [bmwg] WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Sarah B
- [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.org/… Sarah B
- Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.… Sarah B
- Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.… Rukesh D
- Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.… Nabeel Cocker
- Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for https://datatracker.ietf.… Qin Wu