Re: [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance

Hi Adrian, thanks for your comment.

One of my earlier comments (as co-chair, I believe) was that the
terminology needed to be synchronized with RFC 7426 (which had just
been published when I made the comment).  I see that the authors
reproduced the definitions from RFCs, rather than listing them as
terms defined elsewhere.  "path" from RFC 2330 is another example.

So, the first comment is to embrace the existing terminology through
references. Then, more of us will be using the same terms, and reviews
of this work will be more efficient.

regards,
Al
(as co-chair)

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Adrian Farrel
> Sent: Sunday, October 18, 2015 11:19 AM
> To: bmwg@ietf.org
> Cc: sdn@irtf.org
> Subject: [bmwg] Terminology for Benchmarking SDN Controller Performance
> 
> Hi,
> 
> It surprises me that draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term makes
> no reference to RFC 7426 but instead defines its own terminology. Why is
> that?
> 
> Thanks,
> Adrian
> --
> Read my latest...
> Tales from the Wood - Eighteen new fairy tales
> http://www.feedaread.com/books/Tales-from-the-Wood-9781786100924.aspx
> http://www.amazon.co.uk/Tales-Wood-Adrian-Farrel/dp/1786100924
> Or buy from me direct.
> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg