IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] FW: WGLC on New version of draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance

Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Mon, 10 May 2021 16:58 UTC

Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D889B3A2302 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:58:45 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id dEHne3saWb3H for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu [IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 93C353A236E for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 10 May 2021 09:58:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.131] (host-79-121-42-155.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.155]) (authenticated bits=0) by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 14AGwNfg027128 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO); Mon, 10 May 2021 18:58:28 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host host-79-121-42-155.kabelnet.hu [79.121.42.155] claimed to be [192.168.1.131]
To: bmonkman@netsecopen.org
Cc: 'Bala Balarajah' <bala@netsecopen.org>, 'Bala Balarajah' <bm.balarajah@gmail.com>, bmwg@ietf.org, "'MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)'" <acm@research.att.com>, 'Sarah Banks' <sbanks@encrypted.net>
References: <413e779fd7eb4dd4b3aa8473c171e282@att.com> <f1a2b5c5-ebf2-12ab-b053-b9b2538342ad@hit.bme.hu> <047501d745bb$e22f4ab0$a68de010$@netsecopen.org>
From: Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Message-ID: <7dc6b282-7f41-bf7c-f09c-65e7ce94b674@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 18:58:17 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; Win64; x64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.10.1
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <047501d745bb$e22f4ab0$a68de010$@netsecopen.org>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="------------5ACF4839B198997B3D53E41D"
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.102.4 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection) receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.42.155; helo=[192.168.1.131]; envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu; x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC-wuwien-Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/KuEVU3kQio0MqP0a-Pr5lUlNCgc>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] FW: WGLC on New version of draft-ietf-bmwg-ngfw-performance
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 10 May 2021 16:58:46 -0000

Hi Brian,

Perhaps I can do another chunk later this week, and I plan to complete 
it next week.

Best regards,

Gábor

On 5/10/2021 6:45 PM, bmonkman@netsecopen.org wrote:
>
> Hi Gabor,
>
> Thank you very much for your comments. On initial review they all look 
> reasonable to us. How long do you think it will take you to complete 
> your review of the rest of the document?
>
> Brian
>
>

v2.23.0 | Report a Bug | By Email