Re: [bmwg] [bess] REG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpnvpwstest/

Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com> Sat, 28 September 2019 15:32 UTC

Return-Path: <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 62F53120052; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:32:29 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.997
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.997 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, MIME_QP_LONG_LINE=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id ROa04VQKb04N; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:32:27 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk1-x72f.google.com (mail-qk1-x72f.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:4864:20::72f]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D59CF120047; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk1-x72f.google.com with SMTP id p10so4352112qkg.8; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:32:26 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GfCfMsyCNSzRbfA19sID+rdtwOvJNrOps5OEcAdtj44=; b=nF3hpkUOSZ54KRzvqG17dKHmuWIj7OaStOwhCx2Bze+P1NC+l1UtSkNbLHk9Uoh3Ac zU3/kH82T+FbGINLQHeCdse5sX5u8WjKoetCaWqU40bYkIn6AZ5p6AsXvOzva0ywrv4m jHikVJZ6A7J8E5YOOODW92tj6lSKWPHxnOnXqwuFqBdSCJoWfAMmTJu8acI/LqE/sUyW NZpM9UGPLRLsDr1k1dCLbaoySDYs4wDx0+YdZodvRxfjcn4q49M/0GAC+Dxzvql+UQHT +KbDwfYA9F4QeDPSXt1fFhTPAuBZIINMcrvEhMBiuR5wGLH9/tzz7Yn5vRE7ljdTRJGU anDw==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:from:mime-version:subject:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=GfCfMsyCNSzRbfA19sID+rdtwOvJNrOps5OEcAdtj44=; b=IAiTOCeft1UrDlJtNqhc1y3rSw7g6OS+/VzbhC2g/JLYeKxkfzBW0yUu/TXQ2z0h0B G2CigRFRxI+KWQfuEr9COxf1g5r86TBvUWfrOqF06TqYsFng0kfy0/8sEv9sJ1eyZ4Y3 KXbEJS4iJ5A/liYJBKLJ9nbi6jnWrpCOsjdDqLLQ8I0NiZtWD0UKQMXVZ+diAhvtcd44 CrruBTJiQI7KirgsRHYhwkUrwseoL7F47Yxq6h+RVriYfumkN2ctYbRLVh/hxi2/vfrd dMZh8gyxvnt3+7/9b/7ZhRIwwIms6xr0xSQv8BP1QJk3uCGWKRhnYMmDVX0tuZodD/aN 8qRQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: APjAAAVWewczVjp8oMMNh8wdG3dNEiUs4IHCRA0U1l0QOOGTRgiF0mtm QeB9262JfvUtM2MCrZbSYqOYQQRa
X-Google-Smtp-Source: APXvYqwt+U2vwGESOlE9nj+/kQcKJp9J3NVCm5+HFBebMHYYoyXqANpxMq+780Gjgsavy3rabTFg4g==
X-Received: by 2002:a37:a544:: with SMTP id o65mr10562937qke.252.1569684745443; Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:32:25 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ?IPv6:2600:1003:b019:7451:b531:c210:d0a6:a8b9? ([2600:1003:b019:7451:b531:c210:d0a6:a8b9]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d69sm2984565qkc.87.2019.09.28.08.32.24 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Sat, 28 Sep 2019 08:32:24 -0700 (PDT)
From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusagsm@gmail.com>
X-Google-Original-From: Gyan Mishra <hayabusaGSM@gmail.com>
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary=Apple-Mail-7046F235-0746-4CDA-A9E0-04992AF0A0F2
Mime-Version: 1.0 (1.0)
X-Mailer: iPhone Mail (16G102)
In-Reply-To: <MN2PR05MB620825B782549E502D60F8F2C28B0@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 11:32:23 -0400
Cc: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>, "bess@ietf.org" <bess@ietf.org>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <EA6584A5-EA8B-442D-B8A8-DD1DA39B2DD3@gmail.com>
References: <MN2PR05MB620825B782549E502D60F8F2C28B0@MN2PR05MB6208.namprd05.prod.outlook.com>
To: Sudhin Jacob <sjacob=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/ORYDBU6UIHCVLq2t_pD5zJMglSg>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] [bess] REG: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpnvpwstest/
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 28 Sep 2019 15:32:30 -0000


Which Juniper platform was the testing done on?

Also in the drawing you have the RR / Core router.

Can you modify the drawing so it depicts a typical SP environment with separate PE and P in the data plane LSP path and RR sitting separately serving control plane function out of the data plane.

In the core mpls and this is pbb-evpn over mpls analogous to vxlan evpn in DC space.

Is evpn-vpws Junipers version of Cisco pbb-evpn?



Regards,

Gyan S. Mishra
IT Network Engineering & Technology 
Verizon Communications Inc. (VZ)
13101 Columbia Pike FDC1 3rd Floor
Silver Spring, MD 20904
United States
Phone: 301 502-1347
Email: gyan.s.mishra@verizon.com
www.linkedin.com/in/GYAN-MISHRA-RS-SP-MPLS-IPV6-EXPERT

Sent from my iPhone

> On Sep 21, 2019, at 9:04 AM, Sudhin Jacob <sjacob=40juniper.net@dmarc.ietf.org>; wrote:
> 
> Dear All,
>  
> We have floated a draft for benchmarking EVPN-VPWS services. Kindly request you to have a look on it. Please let us know your feedback.
>  
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-kishjac-bmwg-evpnvpwstest/
>  
> Regards,
> Sudhin
>  
>  
> 
> Juniper Business Use Only
>  
> _______________________________________________
> BESS mailing list
> BESS@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bess