Re: [bmwg] BMWG Session at IETF-108
Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu> Mon, 20 July 2020 13:27 UTC
Return-Path: <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id CB1CB3A080C
for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 06:27:25 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.901
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.901 tagged_above=-999 required=5
tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001,
URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44])
by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
with ESMTP id 3vCD-_o2r69C for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>;
Mon, 20 Jul 2020 06:27:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from frogstar.hit.bme.hu (frogstar.hit.bme.hu
[IPv6:2001:738:2001:4020::2c])
(using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
(No client certificate requested)
by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id A3CFE3A080B
for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 06:27:23 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [192.168.1.142] (host-79-121-45-144.kabelnet.hu [79.121.45.144])
(authenticated bits=0)
by frogstar.hit.bme.hu (8.15.2/8.15.2) with ESMTPSA id 06KDRDLw007354
(version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128 verify=NO)
for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:27:19 +0200 (CEST)
(envelope-from lencse@hit.bme.hu)
X-Authentication-Warning: frogstar.hit.bme.hu: Host
host-79-121-45-144.kabelnet.hu [79.121.45.144] claimed to be [192.168.1.142]
To: bmwg@ietf.org
References: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0140BB895A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
From: Gabor LENCSE <lencse@hit.bme.hu>
Message-ID: <bbef1c12-294a-be3e-6941-b69621c6fb71@hit.bme.hu>
Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 15:27:10 +0200
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101
Thunderbird/68.10.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF0140BB895A@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
Content-Language: en-US
X-Virus-Scanned: clamav-milter 0.101.2 at frogstar.hit.bme.hu
X-Virus-Status: Clean
Received-SPF: pass (frogstar.hit.bme.hu: authenticated connection)
receiver=frogstar.hit.bme.hu; client-ip=79.121.45.144; helo=[192.168.1.142];
envelope-from=lencse@hit.bme.hu;
x-software=spfmilter 2.001 http://www.acme.com/software/spfmilter/ with
libspf2-1.2.10;
X-DCC--Metrics: frogstar.hit.bme.hu; whitelist
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.79 on 152.66.248.44
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/Q_tmng7oah4sbwp4BHFnQaLLwSw>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] BMWG Session at IETF-108
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>,
<mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>,
<mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 20 Jul 2020 13:27:26 -0000
Dear Al, Thank you very much for including our draft "An Upgrade to Benchmarking Methodology for Network Interconnect Devices" in the agenda of BMWG Session, IETF-108. Does it mean that we can present it? If yes, could you please write us the conditions? (I mean: time limit, the deadline for preparing and sending the slides to you, and anything else that I do not even think of due to being newbie on the BMWG list). Thank you very much for your help in advance! Best regards, Gábor On 7/18/2020 9:54 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) wrote: > BMWG, > > I have uploaded a draft agenda for our meeting, scheduled in a little over a week: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/agenda-108-bmwg/ > > BMWG Session (IETF-108) ++++ DRAFT as of July 18 ++++ > Monday Session III > 14:10-15:50 UTC, July 27, 2020 (Room 4) > https://datatracker.ietf.org/meeting/108/agenda/ > > We have three WG drafts, all of which saw discussion on-list since our Interim meeting. We will try to take next steps for these. > > We have a number of existing proposals with some comments on-list, along with a new draft/proposal that was discussed throughout May and June. > > All-in-all, we had a rather active bmwg-list since our Interim meeting: Thanks for that! > > So now, a series of requests: > > There were several reviews requested in our meeting minutes from the May 2020 meeting: > The meeting minutes are available here: > https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/minutes-interim-2020-bmwg-01-202005151500/ > > Please help the authors by completing reviews and proof-reads, and thanks to those who did! > (Tim, Sudhin) > > Next, for draft authors -- will you have some updates or further discussion points at this meeting, AND you will be able to attend? > > If yes, please let me know, thanks! If you can't attend, we can use our e-mail list effectively, too. > > my best regards and wishes for your good health, > Al > bmwg co-chair > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- [bmwg] BMWG Session at IETF-108 MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] BMWG Session at IETF-108 Gabor LENCSE
- Re: [bmwg] BMWG Session at IETF-108 MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] BMWG Session at IETF-108 MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)