[bmwg] SDN Controller Performance Benchmarking - New Draft Version
"Bhuvan \(Veryx Technologies\)" <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com> Sun, 18 October 2015 18:01 UTC
Return-Path: <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 68FFF1AC43B for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:01:05 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 4.318
X-Spam-Level: ****
X-Spam-Status: No, score=4.318 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_40=-0.001, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, RCVD_IN_SBL_CSS=3.335, RELAY_IS_203=0.994, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.01] autolearn=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MepiLgbFbP9y for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:01:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail.veryxtech.com (mail.veryxtech.com [203.196.171.45]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 271B61AC43A for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 11:01:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from localhost (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by mail.veryxtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4FD9B318F3; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:28:13 +0530 (IST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at veryxtech.com
Received: from mail.veryxtech.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (mail.veryxtech.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id WovTJwMvM+Z6; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:28:08 +0530 (IST)
Received: from LT015 (unknown [45.112.22.98]) by mail.veryxtech.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id F10263117D for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:28:07 +0530 (IST)
From: "Bhuvan (Veryx Technologies)" <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 23:30:54 +0530
Message-ID: <001b01d109ce$ef660a90$ce321fb0$@veryxtech.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="----=_NextPart_000_001C_01D109FD.09254B70"
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 14.0
Thread-Index: AdEJzu2aLOxM3iRtRHGsu26GdC17sA==
Content-Language: en-in
Archived-At: <http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/U2ZovHVu8j9cDxkVMJZhqBpzZ4Q>
Subject: [bmwg] SDN Controller Performance Benchmarking - New Draft Version
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2015 18:01:05 -0000
Dear BMWG members, Thank you very much for providing your valuable comments and support for this work. We have updated the draft about SDN Controller benchmarking addressing comments received in the mailing list. The latest drafts can be found here: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term-0 0> draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-00 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-0 0> Summary of Changes: 1. Updated the methodology draft - scope section (based on Al's suggestion) to clarify the term SDN controller and the focus of this memo following the comments/discussion in the mailing list. 2. Editorial changes for better readability. We would love to hear any further comments/queries on these drafts. Thanks, Authors
- [bmwg] SDN Controller Performance Benchmarking - … Bhuvan (Veryx Technologies)