[bmwg] Review for draft-vfv-bmwg-srmpls-bench-meth
Boris Khasanov <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru> Wed, 19 October 2022 14:34 UTC
Return-Path: <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D0531C14CE46 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:34:08 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.629
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.629 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTML_MIME_NO_HTML_TAG=0.377, MIME_HTML_ONLY=0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_HI=-5, RCVD_IN_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, T_SCC_BODY_TEXT_LINE=-0.01, URIBL_DBL_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001, URIBL_ZEN_BLOCKED_OPENDNS=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=yandex-team.ru
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([50.223.129.194]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 6PYcrNZxW0Aq for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:34:04 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from forwardcorp1a.mail.yandex.net (forwardcorp1a.mail.yandex.net [178.154.239.72]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (2048 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8564AC14CE44 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 07:34:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from vla5-d6ec41cad181.qloud-c.yandex.net (vla5-d6ec41cad181.qloud-c.yandex.net [IPv6:2a02:6b8:c18:348f:0:640:d6ec:41ca]) by forwardcorp1a.mail.yandex.net (Yandex) with ESMTP id 151BC60055 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:34:01 +0300 (MSK)
Received: from mail.yandex-team.ru (mail.yandex-team.ru [2a02:6b8:b081:7226::1:e]) by vla5-d6ec41cad181.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id qXijDA0474Y1-Y14uNdf5; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:34:01 +0300
X-Yandex-Fwd: 2
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yandex-team.ru; s=default; t=1666190041; bh=nn31rmLLwBf99C+FGNixlgifEcFBTFoEYbMgfsQvUSQ=; h=Date:Subject:To:From:Message-Id; b=pgiu8aIcv4do3hzuA7lTM2w/nCIj/HNwe25bcpVjHKgYm0pHGvud0BP/QpDSCCdiu bxZzzOlkurcImajfytz8NMZDDPK2qXpYBW8i8BXyNAuta5vPu5Ua9Cbn1yI55my/kH ex0RZk/nYLzKkIPPx58/ialSiLfHyasAp2ZXbZMQ=
Authentication-Results: vla5-d6ec41cad181.qloud-c.yandex.net; dkim=pass header.i=@yandex-team.ru
Received: from qitgvz6tzqgj5t6m.vla.yp-c.yandex.net (qitgvz6tzqgj5t6m.vla.yp-c.yandex.net [2a02:6b8:c1f:6255:0:640:95c3:0]) by vla3-850de775f4df.qloud-c.yandex.net (mxbackcorp/Yandex) with HTTP id QXiuu903vGk1-9oSI6i43 for <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:33:51 +0300
Received: by qitgvz6tzqgj5t6m.vla.yp-c.yandex.net with HTTP; Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:33:51 +0300
From: Boris Khasanov <bhassanov@yandex-team.ru>
To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Yamail [ http://yandex.ru ] 5.0
Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 17:34:01 +0300
Message-Id: <34621666176249@mail.yandex-team.ru>
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
Content-Type: text/html; charset="utf-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/V-yRWR2x7I2T3y3XA1aNS3E9kNE>
Subject: [bmwg] Review for draft-vfv-bmwg-srmpls-bench-meth
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.39
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 19 Oct 2022 14:34:08 -0000
"SR policy may be installed by PCEP [RFC8664], BGP [I-D.ietf-idr-segment-routing-te-policy], or via manual configuration on the router. PCEP signaling can be the case of a controller-based deployment. For all these reasons, SR Policies scale better than traditional TE mechanisms."
"RECOMMENDED frame sizes are the following:
* Ethernet Minimal: 64+n*4..."
the test portion of each trial SHOULD be... no less than 200 seconds when a dynamic routing protocol..."
5)
5.1.1. Throughput for SR-MPLS PUSH,
5.1.2. Throughput for SR-MPLS NEXT,
5.1.3. Throughput for SR-MPLS CONTINUE
sent from test tool Tx port(s) to the DUT at a constant load for a fixed-time interval, and is received from the DUT on test tool Rx port(s).
If any frame loss is detected, then a new iteration is needed where the offered load is decreased and the sender will transmit again. An iterative search algorithm MUST be used to determine the maximum offered frame rate with a zero frame loss (No-Drop Rate - NDR).
Each iteration should involve varying the offered load of the traffic, while keeping the other parameters (test duration, number of ports, number of addresses, frame size, etc.) constant, until the maximum rate at which none of the offered frames are dropped is determined."
- [bmwg] Review for draft-vfv-bmwg-srmpls-bench-meth Boris Khasanov
- Re: [bmwg] Review for draft-vfv-bmwg-srmpls-bench… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [bmwg] Review for draft-vfv-bmwg-srmpls-bench… Giuseppe Fioccola
- Re: [bmwg] Review for draft-vfv-bmwg-srmpls-bench… MORTON JR., AL