Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)

"MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Mon, 03 June 2013 21:23 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E1A3D21F91B7 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:23:47 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -106.599
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-106.599 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([12.22.58.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 8wiyEuHs0Lrg for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:23:26 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-pink.research.att.com (mail-pink.research.att.com [192.20.225.111]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C24C521F91BC for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 14:19:24 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-blue.research.att.com (unknown [135.207.178.11]) by mail-pink.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9F5231204B8; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:19:22 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com (njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com [135.207.177.33]) by mail-blue.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 38FD7F0373; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:19:24 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299]) by njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com ([fe80::3598:75fe:b400:9299%11]) with mapi; Mon, 3 Jun 2013 17:19:24 -0400
From: "MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: joel jaeggli <joelja@bogus.com>, Benoit Claise <bclaise@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 17:19:22 -0400
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
Thread-Index: Ac5gn4aPdmHgmR5jRN21GbFevcMMsAAAB/4w
Message-ID: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB76C@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
References: <20130603193601.25935.92180.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB72D@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com> <51ACFDA6.5070005@bogus.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1C9F6CB765@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com> <51AD0772.8000702@bogus.com>
In-Reply-To: <51AD0772.8000702@bogus.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
acceptlanguage: en-US
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Cc: bmwg chair <bmwg-chairs@tools.ietf.org>, bmwg mailing list <bmwg@ietf.org>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 03 Jun 2013 21:23:48 -0000

ok 

please remind fellow ADs to include authors on their comment/discuss e-mails,
so we don't have to go check the evaluation record.

Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com]
> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 5:16 PM
> To: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise
> Cc: bmwg chair; bmwg mailing list
> Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of
> variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-
> ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
> 
> On 6/3/13 2:05 PM, MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> > I just checked the IESG evaluation record, and there are a few
> > more comments I'll try to include in the revision.
> I've put it in ad followup needed.
> 
> if you're going to do another edit please do so quickly.
> >> -----Original Message-----
> >> From: joel jaeggli [mailto:joelja@bogus.com]
> >> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 4:34 PM
> >> To: MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL); Benoit Claise
> >> Cc: bmwg chair; bmwg mailing list
> >> Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of
> >> variable packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC
> (draft-
> >> ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
> >>
> >> On 6/3/13 12:55 PM, MORTON JR., ALFRED C (AL) wrote:
> >>> Hey Joel,  we agreed to several changes that have only appeared in
> >>> a preliminary version (the diffs I sent to Benoit in reply to
> comments).
> >>>
> >>> I need to upload the revised version ASAP, I suppose...
> >> yes
> >>> Al
> >>>
> >>>> -----Original Message-----
> >>>> From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf
> Of
> >>>> The IESG
> >>>> Sent: Monday, June 03, 2013 3:36 PM
> >>>> To: IETF-Announce
> >>>> Cc: bmwg chair; bmwg mailing list; RFC Editor
> >>>> Subject: [bmwg] Document Action: 'IMIX Genome: Specification of
> >> variable
> >>>> packet sizes for additional testing' to Informational RFC (draft-
> ietf-
> >>>> bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt)
> >>>>
> >>>> The IESG has approved the following document:
> >>>> - 'IMIX Genome: Specification of variable packet sizes for additional
> >>>>      testing'
> >>>>     (draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome-04.txt) as Informational RFC
> >>>>
> >>>> This document is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working
> >>>> Group.
> >>>>
> >>>> The IESG contact persons are Joel Jaeggli and Benoit Claise.
> >>>>
> >>>> A URL of this Internet Draft is:
> >>>> http://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-imix-genome/
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> Technical Summary
> >>>>
> >>>>      Benchmarking Methodologies have always relied on test conditions
> >> with
> >>>>      constant packet sizes, with the goal of understanding what
> network
> >>>>      device capability has been tested.  Tests with constant packet
> size
> >>>>      reveal device capabilities but differ significantly from the
> >>>>      conditions encountered in operational deployment, and so
> additional
> >>>>      tests are sometimes conducted with a mixture of packet sizes, or
> >>>>      "IMIX".  The mixture of sizes a networking device will encounter
> is
> >>>>      highly variable and depends on many factors.  An IMIX suited for
> >> one
> >>>>      networking device and deployment will not be appropriate for
> >> another.
> >>>>      However, the mix of sizes may be known and the tester may be
> asked
> >> to
> >>>>      augment the fixed size tests.  To address this need, and the
> >>>>      perpetual goal of specifying repeatable test conditions, this
> draft
> >>>>      defines a way to specify the exact repeating sequence of packet
> >> sizes
> >>>>      from the usual set of fixed sizes, and other forms of mixed size
> >>>>
> >>>> Working Group Summary
> >>>>
> >>>> WG Consensus was smooth after development over a reasonable period of
> >>>> time.
> >>>>
> >>>> Document Quality
> >>>>
> >>>> There are many implementations of various test equipment that use
> IMIX.
> >>>>
> >>>> Personnel
> >>>>
> >>>> Who is the Document Shepherd?  Lucien Avramov
> >>>> Who is the Responsible Area Director?  Joel Jaeggli
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> _______________________________________________
> >>>> bmwg mailing list
> >>>> bmwg@ietf.org
> >>>> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
> >