[bmwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)

Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com> Thu, 10 May 2018 03:05 UTC

Return-Path: <ben@nostrum.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id C570912D871; Wed, 9 May 2018 20:05:53 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Ben Campbell <ben@nostrum.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.80.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152592155377.10350.15217715846718755248.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 20:05:53 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/YVwVUiPktAzp0AD6LaKfxcdxa38>
Subject: [bmwg] Ben Campbell's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 10 May 2018 03:05:54 -0000

Ben Campbell has entered the following ballot position for
charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)



The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/charter-ietf-bmwg/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

I am curious how the discussion around Deborah's block will go. Once that is
resolved, I do not object to approval without external review.

I agree with others that the milestone dates seem aggressive.