[bmwg] updated draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Fri, 16 February 2018 20:39 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3418B129C53 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:39:44 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.602
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.602 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id MOk364A3odlz for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0b-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.157.136]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 7E939128896 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 12:39:42 -0800 (PST)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049462.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w1GKaOrR009817 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:39:41 -0500
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049462.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2g64xqt1r4-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT) for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:39:41 -0500
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1GKdeL6119726 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:39:40 -0600
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [135.46.181.157]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1GKdavF119655 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:39:36 -0600
Received: from zlp30496.vci.att.com (zlp30496.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id D78E5410F45A for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:39:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (unknown [135.41.1.46]) by zlp30496.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id BC1ED410F442 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:39:36 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1GKdaiO006380 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:39:36 -0600
Received: from mail-bd.research.att.com (mail-bd.research.att.com [135.197.255.68]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w1GKdV4B006140 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 14:39:31 -0600
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas2.research.att.com [135.207.255.47]) by mail-bd.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 07AB6E548F for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:39:31 -0500 (EST)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njmtcas2.research.att.com ([fe80::d550:ec84:f872:cad9%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0361.001; Fri, 16 Feb 2018 15:39:30 -0500
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: updated draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame
Thread-Index: AdOnZi/5ICadK/WYRl6Mn0YTblx8Xw==
Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:39:30 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF490B8114@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [135.16.251.234]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2018-02-16_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1015 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=722 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1802160240
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/ahSkMMFLTuIK81gkvzb8hQW6rq8>
Subject: [bmwg] updated draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 16 Feb 2018 20:39:44 -0000

BMWG,

I have prepared an update of

https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame-01

to address comments received at BMWG's session during IETF-100
(further explaining the motivation for the correction factor).

I've also performed some editorial clean-up, and raised a 
second issue related to search algorithms. The two points for
discussion are:

@@@@ Should a particular search algorithm be included?	
		 		
@@@@ Should the search include trial repetition whenever frame loss	
is observed, to avoid the effects of background loss (un-related to	
buffer overflow)?

Diffs are here:
https://tools.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-morton-bmwg-b2b-frame-01.txt

thanks in advance for your consideration, and regards,
Al
(as a participant)