Re: [bmwg] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)

Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro> Thu, 08 June 2017 06:23 UTC

Return-Path: <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37D4912954D; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:23:36 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.702
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.702 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RP_MATCHES_RCVD=-0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=rcs-rds.ro
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id mNqxtQjrVi64; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mailproxy5.rcs-rds.ro (mailproxy5.rcs-rds.ro [212.54.124.6]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 8AA17126CD8; Wed, 7 Jun 2017 23:23:33 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [10.172.5.198] (unknown [10.172.5.198]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mailproxy5.rcs-rds.ro (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 5496128317A; Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:23:31 +0300 (EEST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=rcs-rds.ro; s=MailProxy; t=1496903011; bh=5crSm1gvPEnCjrmynGJ3ynnHiOYH/x5AZjHff5f+wcg=; h=Subject:From:In-Reply-To:Date:Cc:References:To; b=IxAAbMvgCn7owXimGtgklnNzK3Y2G4Oej+Efx/LcwtmV4poOiw9sktNvpcPtJeYxL pjwXEeeqgDaaFx7tDfr9DaAyFWfFzg4v0iEyd4dqvhjYcxjVaWN6Xvd2dN3Ei0UZdG M9nWcSM6I/nBYVVAVSxDtb6wK8NpwCpK7oqAoRKU=
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro>
In-Reply-To: <149678432947.3901.17980895572189082124.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 8 Jun 2017 09:23:28 +0300
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking@ietf.org, Alfred C Morton <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <93A5100B-87BA-4FA5-BAB2-64833B8B405C@rcs-rds.ro>
References: <149678432947.3901.17980895572189082124.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/cXSH9pBLX1He1H6ZWSda32C1RP8>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Alia Atlas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 08 Jun 2017 06:23:36 -0000

Hello Alia,

Thank you for your review.
We will add an informative reference to IEEE802.1ac in the next version.

Best regards,
Marius
> On Jun 7, 2017, at 12:25 AM, Alia Atlas <akatlas@gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> Alia Atlas has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-07: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I note that this document discusses using jumbo Ethernet frames up.
> The IEEE has a standard now for baby giant Ethernet frames - though
> there is still concern about the EtherType value used.   An informative
> reference might be helpful.
> 
>