Re: [bmwg] Favor: Confirm Errata 5207

Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> Mon, 18 December 2017 21:28 UTC

Return-Path: <warren@kumari.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A42C112D940 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:28:36 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: 0
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=0 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id tHLGJ5YC6TC0 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:28:35 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mail-wr0-x234.google.com (mail-wr0-x234.google.com [IPv6:2a00:1450:400c:c0c::234]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C31B512D890 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:28:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: by mail-wr0-x234.google.com with SMTP id l41so3575000wre.11 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:28:34 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=kumari-net.20150623.gappssmtp.com; s=20150623; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date:message-id:subject:to :cc; bh=wZKiVxpPOUj4sR7mU1pqhhZOJ6OsPhOKdTAx5qLvWDE=; b=NZ66i9mElcBDFHWT1V7RLkXVmtxUPb0d5VkXu/kphgsMZOEjX0+/N2ZJZRiSV1x8p4 v5mBJNDQ85bB/lLlYl+gdh/guvEZrBYt9qFUSQeJot7RSaXAySH681sPRGg2PzAicDdE BuRS3rcPn87hpv98NXHQ7/az48xnvn/yw/ZZR/2sPPgeFQ/l9AW6AoR5LGva4uvFjvza Uc8UJ6KWuz9FX317LI7D7ej0v8RUVVrEDHPzE0DsyxXpk9EKAy/9zVt/1UIryH+ysGgz MCurwG60bnEyBcq4dGljUuj+8AJIZJst+iLaQUctPskHw67Afk90Vt+1BqfqzZaxLdLG wBCA==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:in-reply-to:references:from:date :message-id:subject:to:cc; bh=wZKiVxpPOUj4sR7mU1pqhhZOJ6OsPhOKdTAx5qLvWDE=; b=pL5eDsNnb6aj+MkwTNTpoqbV3oxptI6YwKzPX82iShpQhZ20xy9JufxS5sYc6HLLEI gmGnFw37tBvlGWDh3PqzaGx2fU7Txpk2EnkfmjKKmoyQw1X4fQ42mnUKeErDSNQYiM0F qF6RlchwSFqyHSqJWAmajbAkEJoyRG+7u9MLzZVvebIMdN+rPmdgYh9zmzzmKCC1GC+4 5QLjbQyyXVPIaAr+U8OfrXeoyDkZXrBcXv3IcCsnM0Dy2z3pHDKGHkDgbv5QLJqM3DiW /0blUfuE6MnEjhaxykzEvnN3GXVbGld1dXj+NlunQUv8ZEWxU3UKfutHuB/UGoH3QsI+ jCiQ==
X-Gm-Message-State: AKGB3mKELVRx1jkxGbFAFx7pMZFOjDfJ33RY1V3IOFx9nKAL36ZyftW9 ZVaIj7oyLnURPFSFbFSh9zDGZqm+SZNGF3gar0A+IA==
X-Google-Smtp-Source: ACJfBosG58XmzmP8jRAnQsIOJcLFFsixWkvr80q7WnciaKsY0otU4AeE284+5Ern8C7yktMzl7JtiSPYAf3dwqpAF54=
X-Received: by 10.223.201.139 with SMTP id f11mr1675798wrh.283.1513632512989; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:28:32 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.223.160.149 with HTTP; Mon, 18 Dec 2017 13:27:51 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4907B984@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
References: <CAHw9_iKmPer65KBoTBs-sim0ZY5mxJY14ts-FHBUFhnVHB9QCg@mail.gmail.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4907B984@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
From: Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 16:27:51 -0500
Message-ID: <CAHw9_iLpr3Oy1+6QcABZQvhP3_ZYqwGiqyWaAVVMDWAQciYviw@mail.gmail.com>
To: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
Cc: "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/g4P8Z6BKf7ALzlqF0rDI0BdrRHk>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Favor: Confirm Errata 5207
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 18 Dec 2017 21:28:36 -0000

On Mon, Dec 18, 2017 at 2:49 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com> wrote:
> Hi Warren,
>
> I think the fix:
>
> OLD
>    The DUT SHOULD be able to respond to address resolution requests sent
>    by the DUT wherever the protocol requires such a process.
> NEW
>    The DUT SHOULD be able to respond to address resolution requests sent
>    by the tester wherever the protocol requires such a process.
>
> is fine, but it would suggest that
> NEW++
>    The tester SHOULD be able to respond to address resolution requests sent
>    by the DUT wherever the protocol requires such a process.
>
> is also needed, for symmetry.
>

While I agree with you, that it likely larger than an Errata can
cover, and would likely need a -bis document... :-(
W

> Al
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Warren Kumari
>> Sent: Monday, December 18, 2017 1:00 PM
>> To: bmwg@ietf.org
>> Subject: [bmwg] Favor: Confirm Errata 5207
>>
>> Hi there all,
>>
>> This errata looks correct to me, but before I validate it I wanted to
>> ask the WG to confirm I'm not missing anything obvious.
>>
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__www.rfc-
>> 2Deditor.org_errata_eid5207&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
>> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=bjjaUdU3P64iEA1Bgik69SjnzDG
>> 75gAiRQKHQje6bj8&s=AMJgPjE-e67R_B7CwNtTtd385iZHZryxhsF3IS_Sw3M&e=
>>
>> If I don't hear anything to the contrary I'll mark it verified on
>> Friday.
>>
>> W
>>
>> --
>> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
>> idea in the first place.
>> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
>> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
>> of pants.
>>    ---maf
>>
>> _______________________________________________
>> bmwg mailing list
>> bmwg@ietf.org
>> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-
>> 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ-
>> o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=bjjaUdU3P64iEA1Bgik69SjnzDG
>> 75gAiRQKHQje6bj8&s=67LX3SMcO-MP3Udz0Fe-zdJfPsMvHmhl73LQBBnvZwo&e=



-- 
I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
idea in the first place.
This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
of pants.
   ---maf