IETF Logo Mail Archive

Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)

"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> Wed, 09 May 2018 20:20 UTC

Return-Path: <acm@research.att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3AA92128954; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:20:15 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.601
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.601 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t1sq14d4IjSA; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id AF31E128896; Wed, 9 May 2018 13:20:13 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0049295.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0049295.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.21/8.16.0.21) with SMTP id w49KHhMo046306; Wed, 9 May 2018 16:20:12 -0400
Received: from tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (sbcsmtp3.sbc.com [144.160.112.28]) by m0049295.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 2hv4fpwdfe-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Wed, 09 May 2018 16:20:11 -0400
Received: from enaf.dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w49KKAM7043101; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:20:11 -0500
Received: from zlp30497.vci.att.com (zlp30497.vci.att.com [135.46.181.156]) by tlpd255.enaf.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w49KK5gH042902; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:20:05 -0500
Received: from zlp30497.vci.att.com (zlp30497.vci.att.com [127.0.0.1]) by zlp30497.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 74D8240003B0; Wed, 9 May 2018 20:20:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from tlpd252.dadc.sbc.com (unknown [135.31.184.157]) by zlp30497.vci.att.com (Service) with ESMTP id 5185640006FB; Wed, 9 May 2018 20:20:05 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from dadc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by tlpd252.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w49KK4po093115; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:20:05 -0500
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (mail-azure.research.att.com [135.207.255.18]) by tlpd252.dadc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id w49KK027092862; Wed, 9 May 2018 15:20:00 -0500
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njbdcas1.research.att.com [135.197.255.61]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 709E4E0AA3; Wed, 9 May 2018 16:19:59 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njbdcas1.research.att.com ([fe80::8c6b:4b77:618f:9a01%11]) with mapi id 14.03.0389.001; Wed, 9 May 2018 16:19:53 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
To: Alvaro Retana <aretana.ietf@gmail.com>, The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
CC: "bmwg-chairs@ietf.org" <bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)
Thread-Index: AQHT58YihWkh9xJAY0qsr9ShouKrVqQn1UkA
Date: Wed, 9 May 2018 20:19:52 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4A8F40E4@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <152589161812.3989.679087827730128314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
In-Reply-To: <152589161812.3989.679087827730128314.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [212.147.28.4]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: base64
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10434:, , definitions=2018-05-09_07:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 mlxscore=0 impostorscore=0 mlxlogscore=812 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1711220000 definitions=main-1805090189
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/gghgrAhIbwSUdKUTa9Qcxxk8KWk>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 09 May 2018 20:20:15 -0000

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alvaro Retana [mailto:aretana.ietf@gmail.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, May 9, 2018 2:47 PM
> To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
> Cc: bmwg-chairs@ietf.org; bmwg@ietf.org
> Subject: Alvaro Retana's No Objection on charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: (with
> COMMENT)
> 
> Alvaro Retana has entered the following ballot position for
> charter-ietf-bmwg-07-00: No Objection
> 
...
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I am ok with no external review for this charter.
> 
> I would love to see something in the charter about interaction with existing
> WGs (as applicable), specially for the cases where documents are being produced
> for IETF technology.  I see EVPN in the list of milestones, for example; it
> would be great if the bess WG was at least informed/made aware/given a heads
> up, etc. on the work.  I don't think there's a need to list the WGs, but a
> generic sentence such as "consult with/inform other WGs as appropriate" would
> be great!
> 
[acm] 
Hi Alvaro,

The cross-wg review is already a common practice, even presenting
one of our drafts in another working group if there is time
(as recently as London for a proposed draft). We can make the
practice explicit.

Al

v2.2.0 | Report a Bug | By Email