[bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-10.txt
internet-drafts@ietf.org Wed, 28 May 2014 22:42 UTC
Return-Path: <internet-drafts@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id D111E1A0727; Wed, 28 May 2014 15:42:54 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9] autolearn=ham
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id qp5u5hbVS7xn; Wed, 28 May 2014 15:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1C3C71A0272; Wed, 28 May 2014 15:42:51 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: internet-drafts@ietf.org
To: i-d-announce@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 5.4.2.p3
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <20140528224251.28618.77135.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 15:42:51 -0700
Archived-At: http://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/gyOd1FZsV0_u43d6rBNIxXfZ6RY
Cc: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-10.txt
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.15
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 28 May 2014 22:42:55 -0000
A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories. This draft is a work item of the Benchmarking Methodology Working Group of the IETF. Title : Methodology for Benchmarking Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) Devices: Basic session setup and registration Authors : Carol Davids Vijay K. Gurbani Scott Poretsky Filename : draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-10.txt Pages : 17 Date : 2014-05-28 Abstract: This document provides a methodology for benchmarking the Session Initiation Protocol (SIP) performance of devices. Terminology related to benchmarking SIP devices is described in the companion terminology document. Using these two documents, benchmarks can be obtained and compared for different types of devices such as SIP Proxy Servers, Registrars and Session Border Controllers. The term "performance" in this context means the capacity of the device-under- test (DUT) to process SIP messages. Media streams are used only to study how they impact the signaling behavior. The intent of the two documents is to provide a normalized set of tests that will enable an objective comparison of the capacity of SIP devices. Test setup parameters and a methodology are necessary because SIP allows a wide range of configuration and operational conditions that can influence performance benchmark measurements. The IETF datatracker status page for this draft is: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth/ There's also a htmlized version available at: http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-10 A diff from the previous version is available at: http://www.ietf.org/rfcdiff?url2=draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth-10 Please note that it may take a couple of minutes from the time of submission until the htmlized version and diff are available at tools.ietf.org. Internet-Drafts are also available by anonymous FTP at: ftp://ftp.ietf.org/internet-drafts/
- [bmwg] I-D Action: draft-ietf-bmwg-sip-bench-meth… internet-drafts