RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00 .txt
"Perser, Jerry" <jerry.perser@spirentcom.com> Thu, 24 July 2003 17:12 UTC
Received: from optimus.ietf.org (ietf.org [132.151.1.19] (may be forged)) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16126 for <bmwg-archive@lists.ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:12:32 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from localhost.localdomain ([127.0.0.1] helo=www1.ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19fjdJ-00019o-Fr; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:12:01 -0400
Received: from odin.ietf.org ([132.151.1.176] helo=ietf.org) by optimus.ietf.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19fjct-00015n-29 for bmwg@optimus.ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:11:35 -0400
Received: from ietf-mx (ietf-mx.ietf.org [132.151.6.1]) by ietf.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1a) with ESMTP id NAA16076 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:11:28 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from ietf-mx ([132.151.6.1]) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19fjcq-0007mH-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:11:32 -0400
Received: from [199.1.46.3] (helo=brigadoon.spirentcom.com) by ietf-mx with esmtp (Exim 4.12) id 19fjcg-0007kq-00 for bmwg@ietf.org; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 13:11:22 -0400
Received: by brigadoon.spirentcom.com with Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55) id <3FBP08N4>; Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:10:13 -0700
Message-ID: <629E717C12A8694A88FAA6BEF9FFCD44031B319B@brigadoon.spirentcom.com>
From: "Perser, Jerry" <jerry.perser@spirentcom.com>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00 .txt
Date: Thu, 24 Jul 2003 10:10:03 -0700
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-Mailer: Internet Mail Service (5.5.2655.55)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1"
Sender: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
Errors-To: bmwg-admin@ietf.org
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.0.12
Precedence: bulk
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
Convergence time when traffic goes from backup path to preferred path should be a separate metric. In past tests, we were toggling the preferred path status up and down. We notice that the convergence times were different. I do not have an explanation for why failure was different than restore. This asymmetrical convergence time was observed on several different routers. Jerry. ___________________________________________________________ Jerry Perser Spirent Communications Director of Test Methodology SmartBits Division Phone: 818.676.2320 26750 Agoura Road Lab: 818.676.2337 Calabasas, CA, 91302 Cell: 818.292.6457 Corp: 818.676.2300 > -----Original Message----- > From: Thomas Eriksson [mailto:thomas.a.eriksson@teliasonera.com] > Sent: Thursday, July 24, 2003 8:04 AM > To: bmwg@ietf.org > Subject: [bmwg] Comments on > draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00.txt > > > Here are some comments on > draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-00.txt. > > The draft is focusing mainly on convergence time when things > break. It may > also be interesting to study the convergence time when > traffic goes from > backup path to preferred path. > > An interesting test case is when ECMP is used on the SUT and > we want to > benchmark convergence time. I do not think that the current > methodology > will work for this case because some traffic will go over the > "backup path" > as well. This could be fixed by measuring the traffic on the > "prefered > path" and when this traffic is rerouted to the "backup path" > calculate > convergence time based on that. I am not sure however is if > is possible to > produce comparable results when using ECMP ? (I guess it somewhat > implementation dependent function). > > Thomas > > > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg > _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org https://www1.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-datapl… Perser, Jerry
- RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-datapl… Scott Poretsky
- RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-datapl… Perser, Jerry
- RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-datapl… Scott Poretsky
- RE: [bmwg] Comments on draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-datapl… Thomas Eriksson
- [bmwg] something wrong with this list? John Schnizlein