Re: [bmwg] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: (with COMMENT)

Sarah Banks <sarah.banks@gmail.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 16:28 UTC

Return-Path: <sarah.banks@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6A2BF12DA48; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:28:04 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.999
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.999 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, FREEMAIL_FROM=0.001, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (2048-bit key) header.d=gmail.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 3yryGAto9DDr; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail-qk0-x243.google.com (mail-qk0-x243.google.com [IPv6:2607:f8b0:400d:c09::243]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2EA2C12D86E; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
Received: by mail-qk0-x243.google.com with SMTP id a202so5910214qkg.3; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:28:02 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=20161025; h=mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uxLEapGiI3rZXW5vGEZg0Eet4Wrp5Gy39O9OBhMIiTo=; b=CT6eMk3iSnbVcxCiYk57MTxa4w28LFeZfO8w72e2nsfaSRTsEH+3h0IerH2JxtG7Em /9z76pqR9LfL/+Hb7II94LmpcYw4be+TYlQXg62r5VEvOKzrEn8Qi6JLaqnwrhn/Bprx sn9pPbM0G15nHwzlIHsy0f95GqsLEtCfaOkXthyQSg5+Qnqh+9ccUSpykg+abtgHd7mI wEaho/VpX9r3S5DWdzVMrmIVdKvKlXJUgwWvqKI4DLnKP90aZElltVwd5y1RlAH2n85g kZabg+gyb+PiQnal3ycaIe67zmgCk4hXcewmqJqATAZrzoS7ybpgX8JA4PnqLBQmD+F1 9mng==
X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:mime-version:subject:from:in-reply-to:date:cc :content-transfer-encoding:message-id:references:to; bh=uxLEapGiI3rZXW5vGEZg0Eet4Wrp5Gy39O9OBhMIiTo=; b=nlymUuLVTEQLYjm5JhmBwPzfumF8C1wda0X/qG493j+gSTLYdRzAy/lUi0hnJrJAzC 2/7GfCbxLPXMTA1JADp5Rcme1nv2thpAdVQ4lmP9QinyITOtvjkP5QvSu+SNQVRybwh6 wRH6GmaySJWHC2gBvH3062A8o7Tdid3neaCFBSTy+jp9c54LtcpeFs2uaUEQpjk+3DjF fzzz8D/2PquHpVcu4fHrwVuoOmxzZ2lWEyQBDE+4EUvWQSrEYK8E5yFgQ7pQ3pFUMmI5 LKX6Qrmhj7eeeRzLY7xURb5V/fPA4+/Ah+yxV7eBzDNjzEgztrU5PWE0SrZsUGVKZAKf 368A==
X-Gm-Message-State: ALQs6tC8mZrqquTZ6Qi2+0owdZ4G6+IMzBLlTF6x1bzKMeGj74N9hsvK jAxGzF1ng1pZ0gPKQjCmS+Q=
X-Google-Smtp-Source: AIpwx4+ycmy4eDSRKZy1Ri8HvYqkCsT5yfAxqzPgVicDNUFDWAAAKoIVVImJMEJjlQAVjWePfWmt5g==
X-Received: by 10.55.217.205 with SMTP id q74mr6630481qkl.303.1524155281326; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:28:01 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from [127.0.0.1] (aws.hosed.org. [50.16.104.137]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id d1-v6sm3285670qtk.57.2018.04.19.09.27.59 (version=TLS1_2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 bits=128/128); Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:28:00 -0700 (PDT)
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Mime-Version: 1.0 (Mac OS X Mail 10.3 \(3273\))
From: Sarah Banks <sarah.banks@gmail.com>
In-Reply-To: <152412280920.28634.11781896719963987579.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 09:27:56 -0700
Cc: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>, draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth@ietf.org, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, ALFRED MORTON <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg@ietf.org
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Message-Id: <F4731BCA-7B55-4D41-A910-9D698FCA6083@gmail.com>
References: <152412280920.28634.11781896719963987579.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
To: Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com>
X-Mailer: Apple Mail (2.3273)
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/hYuBoV7atpPjLwzmr4XuFtE8QAg>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Adam Roach's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 16:28:04 -0000

Hi Adam,
	Thanks for your comment. we're addressing in a revision now.

Thanks
Sarah

> On Apr 19, 2018, at 12:26 AM, Adam Roach <adam@nostrum.com> wrote:
> 
> Adam Roach has entered the following ballot position for
> draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: No Objection
> 
> When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
> email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
> introductory paragraph, however.)
> 
> 
> Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
> for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.
> 
> 
> The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth/
> 
> 
> 
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> COMMENT:
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> 
> I again share Martin's concerns about the use of the word "standard" in this
> document's abstract and introduction.
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg