Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-09.txt)
Bhuvaneswaran.Vengainathan <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com> Mon, 28 May 2018 09:14 UTC
Return-Path: <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A0157126E01; Mon, 28 May 2018 02:14:41 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.001
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.001 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Authentication-Results: ietfa.amsl.com (amavisd-new); dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=veryxtech.com
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 13aOuHYlC0hy; Mon, 28 May 2018 02:14:39 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from in-mum-m43.icewarpcloud.in (in-mum-m43.icewarpcloud.in [220.226.201.80]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 557D3126DFF; Mon, 28 May 2018 02:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha256; t=1527498871; x=1528103671; s=iwc; d=veryxtech.com; c=relaxed/relaxed; v=1; bh=7CVD6AVJN7qMaemyEbGkJAiy34iTa3flUBJWJbAIiOc=; h=From:Subject:Date:Message-ID:To:Cc:MIME-Version:Content-Type:Content-Transfer-Encoding:In-Reply-To:References; b=GlGUpHz3/gbatCH00K2QYrB3MOWz0mjTjo1rnV1jOUAF8tNlAeUOZOEfe9UwVZZqcM2qIA+M+kdyjqRLxUGizzL8wy44NNaEs0Nlc2KYo+eMbYtBrDn3iD+zsE8DCgUMeMnGMWU0HW6eYMOG8hvmqB/FZk03t+XkacDpl2fZygM=
Received: from veryxtech.com [173.186.244.244] ([127.0.0.1]) by in-mum-m43.icewarpcloud.in (12.0.4 RHEL7 x64) with ASMTP (SSL) id 201805281444300684; Mon, 28 May 2018 14:44:30 +0530
Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 14:43:33 +0530
To: bmwg@ietf.org, "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com>
Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth@ietf.org
From: "Bhuvaneswaran.Vengainathan" <bhuvaneswaran.vengainathan@veryxtech.com>
Message-ID: <eba9139d2286d7cb5b1f134860a0d4f4@veryxtech.com>
X-Mailer: IceWarp Mailer 12.0.4.0 RHEL7 x64-Desktop
In-Reply-To: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4A92519D@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
References: <152727582884.12880.16858138943756846224.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF4A92519D@njmtexg4.research.att.com>
X-Priority: 3
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/i3YX6WhM7AH1inkWMs8zrZCuZyQ>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-09.txt)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 28 May 2018 09:14:42 -0000
Thank you Al for the wishes and your continued support/guidance in driving both the drafts within BMWG. We also would like to thank Warren, ADs and BMWG members who reviewed and provided valuable feedback on these drafts. Thanks & Regards, Bhuvan -----Original Message----- > From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acm@research.att.com> > To: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org > Date: 05/26/18 04:18 > Subject: Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-09.txt) > > Congratulations to the SDN Controller author team, > and Bhuvan in particular for leading the IETF/IESG comment > responses. > > These drafts were the last items on our "old" charter, > and BMWG can begin anew with new milestones to achieve. > > regards, > Al > bmwg co-chair > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: The IESG [mailto:iesg-secretary@ietf.org] > > Sent: Friday, May 25, 2018 3:17 PM > > To: IETF-Announce <ietf-announce@ietf.org> > > Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth@ietf.org; The IESG > > <iesg@ietf.org>; bmwg-chairs@ietf.org; MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) > > <acm@research.att.com>; MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acm@research.att.com>; > > bmwg@ietf.org; warren@kumari.net; rfc-editor@rfc-editor.org > > Subject: Document Action: 'Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller > > Performance' to Informational RFC (draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller- > > benchmark-meth-09.txt) > > > > The IESG has approved the following document: > > - 'Benchmarking Methodology for SDN Controller Performance' > > (draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-09.txt) as Informational > > RFC > > > > This document is the product of the Benchmarking Methodology Working > > Group. > > > > The IESG contact persons are Warren Kumari and Ignas Bagdonas. > > > > A URL of this Internet Draft is: > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > > 3A__datatracker.ietf.org_doc_draft-2Dietf-2Dbmwg-2Dsdn-2Dcontroller- > > 2Dbenchmark-2Dmeth_&d=DwICaQ&c=LFYZ- > > o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=E1ZjpTM8KSoH0KzjCIzI7j1eBcF74 > > ddfHUgI5JQADIc&s=wQWYBgLAaypvz5nKtqC-zzUtYsekma9rK__oyZk7RGs&e= > > > > > > > > > > > > Technical Summary > > > > These two documents ( > > draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term and > > draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth) > > specify the terminology, benchmark definitions > > and methods for characterizing key performance aspects of > > Software Defined Network (SDN) Controllers. Considering the > > number of benchmarking and performance comparison studies that > > have been published prior to standards development, this is an > > important area for new specifications and tools to implement them. > > These memos focus on the ability of SDN controllers to learn > > topology, communicate with switches, and instantiate paths using > > both reactive and proactive techniques (including controller clusters). > > Further, requirements for test traffic and network emulation > > capabilities of the test devices are specified. The memos approach > > this problem in a generic way (Openflow specific procedures are > > included in an Appendix) for broader applicability and longevity. > > > > > > Working Group Summary > > > > Consensus for these drafts required several WGLC which prompted > > careful review and further comments. However, the process to achieve > > consensus was smooth, and at no time was there sustained controversy. > > > > > > Document Quality > > > > There are existing implementations of the methods described here, > > both full and partial, and many are available as Open Source tools. > > Tools are tied to specific versions of Northbound and Southbound > > protocols, but the memo avoids this dependency (and redundancy with > > other industry efforts) by defining benchmarks for generic SDN > > controller functions (as suggested in > > https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- > > 3A__mailarchive.ietf.org_arch_msg_bmwg_Glchqbvg6F7vOUc0ug3ACyztcNg&d=DwICa > > Q&c=LFYZ- > > o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=E1ZjpTM8KSoH0KzjCIzI7j1eBcF74 > > ddfHUgI5JQADIc&s=qmB_8prKT83I7M9AI4TGE-FE63c5XQxsl27qZ6sSnh8&e= ). > > The document benefits from review in the NFVRG, and from interactions > > with the Open Platform for Network Function Virtualization (OPNFV) > > "CPerf" > > project team (which includes members from Open Daylight Integration > > test team, ETSI NFV Test and Open Source WG, and other Linux Foundation > > and independent Open Source projects related to SDN performance). > > > > Personnel > > > > Al Morton is the Document Shepherd > > Warren Kumari is RAD! > > > > > > RFC Editor Note > > > > The documents draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-term and > > draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth should progress together. > > > > It would be nice if they could have sequential RFC Numbers. > _______________________________________________ > bmwg mailing list > bmwg@ietf.org > https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
- [bmwg] Document Action: 'Benchmarking Methodology… The IESG
- Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'Benchmarking Methodo… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] Document Action: 'Benchmarking Methodo… Bhuvaneswaran.Vengainathan