[bmwg] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-b2b-frame-03: (with COMMENT)
Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org> Thu, 17 December 2020 11:11 UTC
Return-Path: <noreply@ietf.org>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B10A33A1614; Thu, 17 Dec 2020 03:11:25 -0800 (PST)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
From: Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker <noreply@ietf.org>
To: The IESG <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-b2b-frame@ietf.org, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, bmwg@ietf.org, Sarah Banks <sbanks@encrypted.net>, sbanks@encrypted.net
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 7.23.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Reply-To: Benjamin Kaduk <kaduk@mit.edu>
Message-ID: <160820348516.13654.3231057156144349452@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 03:11:25 -0800
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/iZULFNgbMpMZ9NvWPThUMlA9ruQ>
Subject: [bmwg] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-b2b-frame-03: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 17 Dec 2020 11:11:26 -0000
Benjamin Kaduk has entered the following ballot position for draft-ietf-bmwg-b2b-frame-03: No Objection When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this introductory paragraph, however.) Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions. The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here: https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-b2b-frame/ ---------------------------------------------------------------------- COMMENT: ---------------------------------------------------------------------- Thank you for staging changes to resolve the tsvart and secdir reviewers' comments. I assume that it goes without saying that the computed StdDev are sample standard deviations, not population standard deviations. Section 6 What kind of DUT is only going to have 4 microseconds of buffer? Section 10.1 It is surprising to see a normative reference being made to the Obsolete RFC 1944. Likewise, some of the references are only tenuously referenced and would seem better characterized as informative (e.g., RFC 6201, RFC 6985). Section 10.2 On the other hand, if the methods of RFC 8239 SHOULD be used in some cases, that suggests that it should more properly be characterized as a normative reference. Similarly, the TST009 binary search is one of the two options from which a selection MUST be made, which seems to make it normative as well.
- [bmwg] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft-iet… Benjamin Kaduk via Datatracker
- Re: [bmwg] Benjamin Kaduk's No Objection on draft… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)