[bmwg] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: (with COMMENT)

Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com> Thu, 19 April 2018 13:50 UTC

Return-Path: <ibagdona@gmail.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 43A79127698; Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:50:49 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: Ignas Bagdonas <ibagdona@gmail.com>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth@ietf.org, Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, acmorton@att.com, bmwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.78.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152414584922.28684.709859147342761564.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 06:50:49 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/jsrt8zlF0flSPISQNpSMarXibYQ>
Subject: [bmwg] Ignas Bagdonas' No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: (with COMMENT)
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 19 Apr 2018 13:50:49 -0000

Ignas Bagdonas has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)

Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.

The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:


The document seems to assume the OpenFlow dataplane abstraction model – which
is one of the possible models; the practical applicability of such model to
anything beyond experimental deployments is a completely separate question
outside of the scope of this document. The methodology tends to apply to a
broader set of central control based systems, and not only to the data plane
operations – therefore the document seems to be setting at least something
practically usable for benchmarking of such central control systems. Possibly
the document could mention such assumptions made about the overall model where
the methodology defined applies to.

A nit: s/Khasanov Boris/Boris Khasanov, unless Boris himself would insist