[bmwg] Mirja Kühlewind's No Objection on draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: (with COMMENT)

Mirja Kühlewind <ietf@kuehlewind.net> Wed, 18 April 2018 16:14 UTC

Return-Path: <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietf.org
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from ietfa.amsl.com (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6D00E127522; Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:14:35 -0700 (PDT)
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
From: =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind?= <ietf@kuehlewind.net>
To: "The IESG" <iesg@ietf.org>
Cc: draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth@ietf.org, Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>, bmwg-chairs@ietf.org, acmorton@att.com, bmwg@ietf.org
X-Test-IDTracker: no
X-IETF-IDTracker: 6.78.0
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
Precedence: bulk
Message-ID: <152406807539.30682.14437656970962434274.idtracker@ietfa.amsl.com>
Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 09:14:35 -0700
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/luHvQfMdx2ByoxABNe_Q21TkWEI>
Subject: [bmwg] =?utf-8?q?Mirja_K=C3=BChlewind=27s_No_Objection_on_draft-i?= =?utf-8?q?etf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08=3A_=28with_COMMENT=29?=
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 18 Apr 2018 16:14:35 -0000

Mirja Kühlewind has entered the following ballot position for
draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth-08: No Objection

When responding, please keep the subject line intact and reply to all
email addresses included in the To and CC lines. (Feel free to cut this
introductory paragraph, however.)


Please refer to https://www.ietf.org/iesg/statement/discuss-criteria.html
for more information about IESG DISCUSS and COMMENT positions.


The document, along with other ballot positions, can be found here:
https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/draft-ietf-bmwg-sdn-controller-benchmark-meth/



----------------------------------------------------------------------
COMMENT:
----------------------------------------------------------------------

Editorial comments:

1) sdn-controller-benchmark-term should probably rather be referred in the
intro (instead of the abstract).

2) Is the test setup needed in both docs (this and
sdn-controller-benchmark-term) or would a reference to
sdn-controller-benchmark-term maybe be sufficient?

3) Appendix A.1 should probably also be moved to sdn-controller-benchmark-term