Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking
"MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com> Tue, 18 April 2017 11:51 UTC
Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E046E129B63; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:51:13 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -3.411
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-3.411 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H2=-2.8, SPF_PASS=-0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id t5tvUNPAzR2E; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com (mx0a-00191d01.pphosted.com [67.231.149.140]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C0438129B84; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 04:51:10 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from pps.filterd (m0048589.ppops.net [127.0.0.1]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. (8.16.0.17/8.16.0.17) with SMTP id v3IBjY2p026390; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:51:08 -0400
Received: from alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (sbcsmtp7.sbc.com [144.160.229.24]) by m0048589.ppops.net-00191d01. with ESMTP id 29w84usrvm-1 (version=TLSv1.2 cipher=ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NOT); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:51:07 -0400
Received: from enaf.aldc.att.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3IBp6uJ018722; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:51:06 -0400
Received: from mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com [130.9.128.241]) by alpi155.enaf.aldc.att.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3IBotTe018556 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:50:57 -0400
Received: from clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (clpi183.sldc.sbc.com [135.41.1.46]) by mlpi409.sfdc.sbc.com (RSA Interceptor); Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:50:47 GMT
Received: from sldc.sbc.com (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3IBokAg018419; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:50:46 -0500
Received: from mail-azure.research.att.com (mail-azure.research.att.com [135.207.255.18]) by clpi183.sldc.sbc.com (8.14.5/8.14.5) with ESMTP id v3IBoeYD018133; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 06:50:41 -0500
Received: from exchange.research.att.com (njmtcas2.research.att.com [135.207.255.47]) by mail-azure.research.att.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE040E0425; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:50:39 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from njmtexg5.research.att.com ([fe80::b09c:ff13:4487:78b6]) by njmtcas2.research.att.com ([fe80::d550:ec84:f872:cad9%15]) with mapi id 14.03.0319.002; Tue, 18 Apr 2017 07:50:39 -0400
From: "MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>
To: Marius Georgescu <marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro>, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net>
CC: "bmwg-chairs@ietf.org" <bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>, "draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking@ietf.org" <draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking@ietf.org>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking
Thread-Index: AQHStT7P6GGywmc5/UW/liz/M3vuoqHGb7iA///xyCCABKnkAP//+jgQ
Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:50:38 +0000
Message-ID: <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF25F7151C@njmtexg5.research.att.com>
References: <CAHw9_iJ+PcuJVS3ougbFUQkT0OwmEXbRVqy=44bORwUHar-FzQ@mail.gmail.com> <ADC8E1B6-CEC2-42CE-9BB8-F4A8EE8630EF@rcs-rds.ro> <4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF25F70C23@njmtexg5.research.att.com> <C7D080C6-E54B-49F9-BB09-B7F6126D6237@rcs-rds.ro>
In-Reply-To: <C7D080C6-E54B-49F9-BB09-B7F6126D6237@rcs-rds.ro>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [130.10.254.167]
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_4D7F4AD313D3FC43A053B309F97543CF25F7151Cnjmtexg5researc_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-RSA-Inspected: yes
X-RSA-Classifications: public
X-Proofpoint-Virus-Version: vendor=fsecure engine=2.50.10432:, , definitions=2017-04-18_10:, , signatures=0
X-Proofpoint-Spam-Details: rule=outbound_policy_notspam policy=outbound_policy score=0 priorityscore=1501 malwarescore=0 suspectscore=0 phishscore=0 bulkscore=0 spamscore=0 clxscore=1011 lowpriorityscore=0 impostorscore=0 adultscore=0 classifier=spam adjust=0 reason=mlx scancount=1 engine=8.0.1-1702020001 definitions=main-1704180096
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/pWY9omeo2S2FVvN9nwG-YryNXSs>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.22
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 18 Apr 2017 11:51:14 -0000
Hi Marius, thanks for your editing efforts. I think you have handled all of Warren's editorial comments and the two small issues identified in the shepherd's form (which I will remove and indicate the new version). @Warren - we're on our way again, thanks for your review. Al doc shepherd From: Marius Georgescu [mailto:marius.georgescu@rcs-rds.ro] Sent: Tuesday, April 18, 2017 3:57 AM To: MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) Cc: Warren Kumari; bmwg-chairs@ietf.org; draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking@ietf.org; bmwg@ietf.org Subject: Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking Hello Al, Thank you for your kind help with this draft. The revised version covers the received comments. https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-06<https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https-3A__tools.ietf.org_html_draft-2Dietf-2Dbmwg-2Dipv6-2Dtran-2Dtech-2Dbenchmarking-2D06&d=DwMFAg&c=LFYZ-o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=2HUOwbd3l5OJGvE94oeM8_Eh2GN0L9juGEi8A0uBzaw&s=u3qaLjeINQmyjGL26zFUOWhnBDBY8kcE9Mh8oRXALjQ&e=> If there are any other issues, please let us know. Best regards, Marius On Apr 15, 2017, at 3:56 PM, MORTON, ALFRED C (AL) <acmorton@att.com<mailto:acmorton@att.com>> wrote: Hi Marius, Since all ADs read *many* documents, it is universally preferred to respond quickly as you've done, and follow-up with a revised version in this case (and when requested in the steps that follow). When the revised version is available, the next step will likely be an IETF-wide Last Call. This is when the various Directorates that help the Area Directors will review the draft, and there will be some more comments as a result. After Last Call, the draft will be scheduled for an IESG telechat, and the other Area Directors will likely provide even more comments. Prompt replies and resolving text will again keep your draft moving. If you have any questions as we proceed, don't hesitate to get in touch. regards, Al bmwg co-chair and doc shepherd -----Original Message----- From: bmwg [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of Marius Georgescu Sent: Saturday, April 15, 2017 5:35 AM To: Warren Kumari Cc: bmwg-chairs@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg-chairs@ietf.org>; draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech- benchmarking@ietf.org<mailto:benchmarking@ietf.org>; bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> Subject: Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech- benchmarking Hello Warren, Thank you very much for your kind words and for the detailed review. We will revise the draft considering the Shepherd writeup and your comments. Is there a deadline we should be aware of? Best regards, Marius On Apr 14, 2017, at 7:46 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net<mailto:warren@kumari.net>> wrote: Hi there, First off, thanks for a really well written document -- I've done some benchmarking of routers and switches and similar, but never and translation devices. This document explains how I would benchmark this nicely. I had a few minor nits which I think would be nice if you could address before I start IETF LC - this should help the document sail though the process. While addressing these, there are also 2 editorial notes in the Shepherd writeup, both (IMO) easy to address. W Section 1: "ability to gracefully accommodate greater numbers of flows than the maximum number of flows which the DUT can operate normally." [O] DUT [P] [spell out DUT] [R] first use of the acronym Section 1.1. IPv6 Transition Technologies "4. Encapsulation: The production network is assumed to have all three domains, Domains A and B are IPvX specific, while the core ..." [O] three domains, Domains A and B [P] three domains; Domains A and B [R] grammar Section 5.1. Frame Formats and Sizes "The two documents can be referred for the dual-stack transition technologies." [O] referred [P] referenced [R] not sure what is meant; referenced is just a guess here. Or "referred to"? Nither sounds great. "The calculation method for the Ethernet, as well as a calculation example are detailed in Appendix A. " [O] calculation example are [P] calculation example, are [R] grammar Section 6. Modifiers The idea of testing under different operational conditions was first introduced in [RFC2544](Section 11) and represents an important aspect of benchmarking network elements, as it emulates to some extent the conditions of a production environment. Section 6 of [O] as it emulates to some extent the [P] as it emulates, to some extent, the [R] grammar Section 8. Additional Benchmarking Tests for Stateful IPv6 Transition Technologies This section describes additional tests dedicated to the stateful IPv6 transition technologies. For the tests described in this section the DUT devices SHOULD follow the test setup and test [O] section the DUT device [P] section, the DUT device [R] grammar - If the DNS64 server implements caching and there is a cache hit then step 1 is followed by step 6 (and steps 2 through 5 are omitted). - If the domain name has an AAAA record then it is returned in [O] If the domain name has an AAAA record then it is returned [P] If the domain name has an AAAA record, then it is returned (When all the domain names are cached then the results do not depend on what percentage of the ... [O] are cached then the [P] are cached, the [R] readability (When all the domain names are cached then the results do not depend on what percentage of the domain names have AAAA records, thus these combinations are not worth testing one by one.) [O] are cached then the [P] are cached, the [R] readability queries at the required frequency using up not more than the half of the timeout time. Remark: a sample open-source test program, dns64perf++ is available [O] dns64perf++ is [P] dns64perf++, is [R] grammar For encapsulation transition technologies a m:n setup can be [O] For encapsulation transition technologies [P] For encapsulation transition technologies, [R] grammar created, where m is the number of flows applied to the same client device and n the number of client devices connected to the same server device. For the translation based transition technologies the client devices [O] For the translation based transition technologies the client [P] For the translation based transition technologies, the client [R] grammar In other words, if flow I is started at time x, flow i+1 [O] flow I is started at time x, flow i+1 [R] I and i should be consistent; either use upper or lower case. Same for other variables. Section 11. NAT44 and NAT66 Although these technologies are not the primarily scope of this [O] the primarily scope [P] the primary scope [R] word choice Section 12. Summarizing function and variation For a fine grain analysis of the frequency distribution of the data, [O] fine grain analysis [P] fine grained analysis [R] word choice -- I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad idea in the first place. This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair of pants. ---maf _______________________________________________ bmwg mailing list bmwg@ietf.org<mailto:bmwg@ietf.org> https://urldefense.proofpoint.com/v2/url?u=https- 3A__www.ietf.org_mailman_listinfo_bmwg&d=DwICAg&c=LFYZ- o9_HUMeMTSQicvjIg&r=OfsSu8kTIltVyD1oL72cBw&m=AUvQF5fSs3nruuM6VEndHNo4IEW FISyixgNCDlimEFk&s=wgtEceg7IsJIzEfu1N0VBNJcuYUx4X7fqNHAJmsV2AE&e=
- [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tra… Warren Kumari
- Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6… Marius Georgescu
- Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6… Marius Georgescu
- Re: [bmwg] AD Evaluation for draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6… MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)