Re: [bmwg] Final edits on draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking

Hello Warren,

Thank you for your help.
We have uploaded version 8, which covers from our perspective the IESG comments.
https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-08 <https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-ipv6-tran-tech-benchmarking-08>

Best regards,
Marius (for the authors)
> On Jun 8, 2017, at 9:31 PM, Warren Kumari <warren@kumari.net> wrote:
> 
> Hi there,
> 
> Your document was on the IESG telechat today, and is now in Approved,
> Point Raised raised state. It doesn't strictly **need** a revised ID,
> but I do think that incorporating these helpful comments /
> clarifications.
> 
> Alia thinks it could do with an informative reference for baby jumbo
> frames, and says that she has provided a helpful to Al. I think that
> it would be useful to include that, and, while you are editing it,
> also address Alvaro and Adam's points (they are simply
> clarifications).
> 
> Please explicitly let me know once done, and I can finish the
> approval, and ship it to the RFC ed.
> 
> W
> 
> -- 
> I don't think the execution is relevant when it was obviously a bad
> idea in the first place.
> This is like putting rabid weasels in your pants, and later expressing
> regret at having chosen those particular rabid weasels and that pair
> of pants.
>   ---maf
> 
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg