[bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg
WB Lee <leewb@etri.re.kr> Fri, 08 March 2019 04:12 UTC
Return-Path: <leewb@etri.re.kr>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 88A211312F0 for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 20:12:30 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -1.9
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-1.9 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_NONE=-0.0001, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([4.31.198.44]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 2QfxpR_Lx3wO for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 20:12:26 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mscreen.etri.re.kr (mscreen.etri.re.kr [129.254.9.16]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B5C91131304 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Thu, 7 Mar 2019 20:12:25 -0800 (PST)
Received: from unknown (HELO smtpeg.etri.re.kr) (129.254.27.142) by 129.254.9.16 with ESMTP; 8 Mar 2019 13:12:19 +0900
X-Original-SENDERIP: 129.254.27.142
X-Original-MAILFROM: leewb@etri.re.kr
X-Original-RCPTTO: bmwg@ietf.org
Received: from SMTP4.etri.info (129.254.28.74) by SMTPEG2.etri.info (129.254.27.142) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:12:24 +0900
Received: from leewbPC (129.254.190.240) by SMTP4.etri.info (129.254.28.74) with Microsoft SMTP Server id 14.3.319.2; Fri, 8 Mar 2019 13:12:19 +0900
From: WB Lee <leewb@etri.re.kr>
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 13:12:17 +0900
Message-ID: <000601d4d565$1dfd26d0$59f77470$@etri.re.kr>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Mailer: Microsoft Outlook 16.0
Thread-Index: AdTVY9tv7YkGX6MVR5S114UAvq6Y0g==
Content-Language: ko
X-Originating-IP: [129.254.190.240]
Archived-At: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/msg/bmwg/t7S3KWOgvAMiFHYCYAWXDfkHv4M>
Subject: [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <https://mailarchive.ietf.org/arch/browse/bmwg/>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2019 04:12:35 -0000
Hi All, We have been researched the POD testing in Containerized Infrastructures. We submitted the new draft, "Considerations for Benchmarking Network Performance in Containerized Infrastructures". https://www.ietf.org/id/draft-dcn-bmwg-containerized-infra-00.txt Abstract This draft describes benchmarking considerations for a containerized infrastructure. In a containerized infrastructure, Virtualized Network Functions(VNFs) are deployed on operating-system-level virtualization platform by abstracting the user namespace as opposed to virtualization using a hypervisor. Leveraging this, the system configurations and networking scenarios for VNF benchmarking will be partially changed by way of resource allocation and network port binding between a physical host and VNFs. In this draft we compare the state of the art in container networking architecture with networking on VM-based virtualized systems, and provide several test scenarios for network performance in containerized infrastructure. We welcome any comments. Regards, Wangbong Lee
- [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg WB Lee
- Re: [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)
- Re: [bmwg] A new draft aimed at bmwg MORTON, ALFRED C (AL)