Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for

Qin Wu <> Mon, 29 April 2019 11:21 UTC

Return-Path: <>
Received: from localhost (localhost []) by (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5E2831202FF for <>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:21:20 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -2.21
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.21 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[BAYES_00=-1.9, HTML_MESSAGE=0.001, HTTPS_HTTP_MISMATCH=1.989, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-2.3, SPF_PASS=-0.001, URIBL_BLOCKED=0.001] autolearn=unavailable autolearn_force=no
Received: from ([]) by localhost ( []) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id rsssmZxF8qwp for <>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:21:18 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from ( []) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D58D412008F for <>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 04:21:17 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from (unknown []) by Forcepoint Email with ESMTP id E87C634D8FF1625D3C73 for <>; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:21:15 +0100 (IST)
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 14.3.408.0; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:21:15 +0100
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_2, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_GCM_SHA256) id 15.1.1713.5; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:21:15 +0100
Received: from ( by ( with Microsoft SMTP Server (version=TLS1_0, cipher=TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_128_CBC_SHA) id 15.1.1713.5 via Frontend Transport; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 12:21:14 +0100
Received: from ([]) by ([]) with mapi id 14.03.0415.000; Mon, 29 Apr 2019 19:21:08 +0800
From: Qin Wu <>
To: Nabeel Cocker <>, Rukesh D <>
CC: "" <>
Thread-Topic: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for
Thread-Index: AdT+fYGo8TcLGUBaQAe1yqurcJf8TA==
Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:21:07 +0000
Message-ID: <>
Accept-Language: zh-CN, en-US
Content-Language: zh-CN
x-originating-ip: []
Content-Type: multipart/alternative; boundary="_000_B8F9A780D330094D99AF023C5877DABAA4904243nkgeml513mbxchi_"
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-CFilter-Loop: Reflected
Archived-At: <>
Subject: Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <>
List-Unsubscribe: <>, <>
List-Archive: <>
List-Post: <>
List-Help: <>
List-Subscribe: <>, <>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 29 Apr 2019 11:21:21 -0000

Useful work, support it.

发件人: bmwg [] 代表 Nabeel Cocker
发送时间: 2019年4月29日 2:41
收件人: Rukesh D <>
主题: Re: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for


I have read through this doc and support it. Definitely need such work.


On Wed, Apr 24, 2019 at 12:48 AM Rukesh D <<>> wrote:
I went through the draft. It covers all the fail-over scenarios and bench-marks the convergence of traffic. These test cases are highly needed for any deployment. As and when, new enhancements are implemented, these test cases helps to benchmark.
I support this draft.

From: bmwg <<>> on behalf of Sarah B <<>>
Date: Monday, April 15, 2019 at 12:35 PM
To: "<>" <<>>
Subject: [bmwg] 2nd WGLC for

I'd sent this first wGLC for draft-ietf-bmwg-evpntest before Christmas, and while I gave it a longer period of time for comments, we've received none. So, I'd like to send it through WGLC again, ending Tuesday, April 30. Please share your comments and feedback here on the list.


On Dec 7, 2018, at 9:59 AM, Sarah B <<>> wrote:

A quick clarification. The WGLC is for the Internet-Draft describing a benchmarking methodology for EVPN and PBB-EVPN, NOT BGP Basic Convergence. My apologies for the incorrect cut/paste. The draft link below is incorrect as well; data tracker no longer references full links with versions, so please use:<>

And note that the current version as of this email/time of writing is -01.


On Dec 7, 2018, at 9:45 AM, Sarah B <<>> wrote:

Hello BMWG,

A Working Group Last Call (WGLC) period for the Internet-Draft describing BGP Basic convergence:<>

will be open for 6 weeks from today, and close on January 18, 2019. This is a bit longer of a WGLC window, but accommodates the end of year interruptions some members might experience.  Please weigh in on whether or not you feel that this Internet-Draft should be given to the Area Directors for consideration to progressing as an Informational RFC. Send your comments to this list. Your timely and prompt review and feedback is greatly appreciated!

Kind regards,
BMWG co-chairs
bmwg mailing list<>

bmwg mailing list<>

bmwg mailing list<>