Re: [bmwg] Brief WG Status

Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com> Wed, 20 February 2013 12:44 UTC

Return-Path: <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 50C2E21F872C for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:44:13 -0800 (PST)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -6.598
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-6.598 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.001, BAYES_00=-2.599, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.30]) by localhost (ietfa.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id YYXe1maUoWHH for <bmwg@ietfa.amsl.com>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:44:12 -0800 (PST)
Received: from exprod7og112.obsmtp.com (exprod7og112.obsmtp.com [64.18.2.177]) by ietfa.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id F01D321F87AF for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:44:11 -0800 (PST)
Received: from mx5.jdsu.com ([209.36.247.247]) (using TLSv1) by exprod7ob112.postini.com ([64.18.6.12]) with SMTP ID DSNKUSTFGxTuCw+zuWlfvrySOfDIUNIhuyNU@postini.com; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:44:12 PST
Received: from AMEXHTCA03.ds.jdsu.net (192.168.10.43) by mx5.jdsu.com (192.168.10.247) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.3.213.0; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:39:35 -0800
Received: from AMEXMB01.ds.jdsu.net ([fe80::9402:2c4c:29f3:a264]) by AMEXHTCA03.ds.jdsu.net ([fe80::24df:4228:5274:253d%14]) with mapi id 14.02.0318.004; Wed, 20 Feb 2013 04:39:59 -0800
From: Barry Constantine <Barry.Constantine@jdsu.com>
To: "MORTON JR., ALFRED (AL)" <acmorton@att.com>, "bmwg@ietf.org" <bmwg@ietf.org>
Thread-Topic: Brief WG Status
Thread-Index: Ac4EpZQdspWvw5TJSWugBH95E2JQ6wKMea5wACPY93A=
Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:39:58 +0000
Message-ID: <DE2AAE0A8826CF4ABC3A6CCB756356EB0E39F9@AMEXMB01.ds.jdsu.net>
References: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1BEE8D63CC@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com> <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1BF83B0451@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
In-Reply-To: <F1312FAF1A1E624DA0972D1C9A91379A1BF83B0451@njfpsrvexg7.research.att.com>
Accept-Language: en-US
Content-Language: en-US
X-MS-Has-Attach:
X-MS-TNEF-Correlator:
x-originating-ip: [157.234.234.5]
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
MIME-Version: 1.0
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Brief WG Status
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.12
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/options/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 20 Feb 2013 12:44:22 -0000

Hi Al,

Tim, Ramki, and I would like to review the progress made on the Traffic Management benchmarking draft.

We hope to be added to the BMWG charter and accepted as formal draft work.

Thank you,
Barry Constantine

JDSU Communications Test
Principal Member Technical Staff
301-325-7069

-----Original Message-----
From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf Of MORTON JR., ALFRED (AL)
Sent: Tuesday, February 19, 2013 2:36 PM
To: bmwg@ietf.org
Subject: Re: [bmwg] Brief WG Status

BMWG,

This is the message to initiate agenda discussions.
Please indicate what draft you want to discuss and what the specific issues are you hope to resolve in our time together. If we've already exchanged mail this week, no need to confirm.

Two items escaped the brief status below, the BGP Benchmarking and the IPv6 Neighbor Discovery work proposed by Ron at the last meeting.  There's been some progress on both these items.

regards,
Al

> -----Original Message-----
> From: bmwg-bounces@ietf.org [mailto:bmwg-bounces@ietf.org] On Behalf 
> Of MORTON JR., ALFRED (AL)
> Sent: Wednesday, February 06, 2013 3:32 PM
> To: bmwg@ietf.org
> Subject: [bmwg] Brief WG Status
> 
> 
> BMWG,
> 
> With a face-to-face meeting opportunity just around the corner, it's 
> time to briefly review our status.
> 
> There are (at least) two new work proposals in draft-form seeking your 
> review:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-constantine-bmwg-traffic-management-
> 00.txt
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-manral-bmwg-power-usage-03.txt
> 
> There is a draft addressing a chartered item on data center bridges:
> 
> http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-player-dcb-benchmarking-04
> 
> and another data center-oriented proposal in preparation.
> 
> Software Upgrade Benchmarking still has the attention of a few of our 
> friends, with a draft in preparation.
> 
> *The bottom line:*
> >>>>> We need to see folks reading these drafts and providing 
> >>>>> comments/indicating interest to complete these proposals in 
> >>>>> BMWG.
> 
> As far as Chartered work goes:
> 
>  - revised drafts expected on Content Aware Benchmarking
>  - extensive IETF Last Call comments on the SIP drafts
>  - WGLC on the IMIX Genome draft to begin immediately
> 
> We've also received a liaisons from the MEF for Action:
> https://datatracker.ietf.org/liaison/1236/
> If folks have any comment on the Service Activation Testing document 
> they reference, please send them to the list.
> 
> Once we get an idea of hot topics for discussion, we'll look at the 
> agenda for a session in Orlando.
> 
> regards,
> Al
> bmwg chair
> _______________________________________________
> bmwg mailing list
> bmwg@ietf.org
> https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg
_______________________________________________
bmwg mailing list
bmwg@ietf.org
https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg