Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane drafts

Al Morton <acmorton@att.com> Wed, 15 July 2009 19:49 UTC

Return-Path: <acmorton@att.com>
X-Original-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Delivered-To: bmwg@core3.amsl.com
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E42A83A6ADB for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at amsl.com
X-Spam-Flag: NO
X-Spam-Score: -105.6
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-105.6 tagged_above=-999 required=5 tests=[AWL=0.196, BAYES_00=-2.599, MSGID_FROM_MTA_HEADER=0.803, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_MED=-4, USER_IN_WHITELIST=-100]
Received: from mail.ietf.org ([64.170.98.32]) by localhost (core3.amsl.com [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id cf4LTTCfiBTy for <bmwg@core3.amsl.com>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:49:32 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from mail120.messagelabs.com (mail120.messagelabs.com [216.82.250.83]) by core3.amsl.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id E632E3A6BF9 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:49:19 -0700 (PDT)
X-VirusChecked: Checked
X-Env-Sender: acmorton@att.com
X-Msg-Ref: server-13.tower-120.messagelabs.com!1247687292!30687768!1
X-StarScan-Version: 6.0.0; banners=-,-,-
X-Originating-IP: [144.160.128.141]
Received: (qmail 17082 invoked from network); 15 Jul 2009 19:48:13 -0000
Received: from sbcsmtp9.sbc.com (HELO flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com) (144.160.128.141) by server-13.tower-120.messagelabs.com with DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA encrypted SMTP; 15 Jul 2009 19:48:13 -0000
Received: from enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6FJmCHx004172 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:48:12 -0700
Received: from klph001.kcdc.att.com (klph001.kcdc.att.com [135.188.3.11]) by flph161.enaf.ffdc.sbc.com (8.14.3/8.14.3) with ESMTP id n6FJm9AX004141 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 12:48:09 -0700
Received: from kcdc.att.com (localhost.localdomain [127.0.0.1]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n6FJm9Fx015128 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:48:09 -0500
Received: from maillennium.att.com (dns.maillennium.att.com [135.25.114.99]) by klph001.kcdc.att.com (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id n6FJm39K015030 for <bmwg@ietf.org>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 14:48:03 -0500
Message-Id: <200907151948.n6FJm39K015030@klph001.kcdc.att.com>
Received: from acmt.att.com (dyp004276dys.mt.att.com[135.16.251.251](misconfigured sender)) by maillennium.att.com (mailgw1) with SMTP id <20090715194803gw1003ibl2e>; Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:48:03 +0000
X-Originating-IP: [135.16.251.251]
X-Mailer: QUALCOMM Windows Eudora Version 7.1.0.9
Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 15:47:54 -0400
To: bmwg@ietf.org
From: Al Morton <acmorton@att.com>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; format="flowed"
Subject: Re: [bmwg] WGLC: draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane drafts
X-BeenThere: bmwg@ietf.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.9
Precedence: list
List-Id: Benchmarking Methodology Working Group <bmwg.ietf.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://www.ietf.org/mail-archive/web/bmwg>
List-Post: <mailto:bmwg@ietf.org>
List-Help: <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://www.ietf.org/mailman/listinfo/bmwg>, <mailto:bmwg-request@ietf.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 15 Jul 2009 19:49:33 -0000

Comments on meth-18, all nits,
Al (mostly as participant)

At 01:44 PM 7/14/2009, Al Morton wrote:
>...This message begins a Last call on the IGP-Dataplane Convergence
>Time Benchmarking drafts.
>
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-term-18
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-meth-18
>http://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-ietf-bmwg-igp-dataplane-conv-app-17
>
>The Last Call will end on July 31, 2009.


Section 4, top of page 10,
s/At least one condition need to /At least one condition needs to /


5.7.  Measurement Accuracy
...  When packet jitter is much less than the convergence
    time, it is a negligible source of error and therefor it will be
s/therefor/therefore/

5.9 Tester Capabilities
Add "Also see section 6 for method-specific capabilities."

6.1.3.  Measurement Accuracy

    TBD
(can't leave this TBD, if there's no obvious material, delete section ?)


Section 7, Reporting Format

         Maximum Packet Delay Threshold      seconds
this is called "Forwarding Delay Threshold" in the term doc, right?
pick one for both...

Section 9, same as terms, use the standard BMWG paragraphs...